[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <IA1PR12MB6353847AB0BC0B15EFD46953AB1D9@IA1PR12MB6353.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2022 06:53:18 +0000
From: Emeel Hakim <ehakim@...dia.com>
To: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Raed Salem <raeds@...dia.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"atenart@...nel.org" <atenart@...nel.org>,
"jiri@...nulli.us" <jiri@...nulli.us>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] macsec: add support for
IFLA_MACSEC_OFFLOAD in macsec_changelink
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
> Sent: Thursday, 8 December 2022 0:04
> To: Emeel Hakim <ehakim@...dia.com>
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Raed Salem <raeds@...dia.com>;
> davem@...emloft.net; edumazet@...gle.com; kuba@...nel.org;
> pabeni@...hat.com; netdev@...r.kernel.org; atenart@...nel.org; jiri@...nulli.us
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] macsec: add support for
> IFLA_MACSEC_OFFLOAD in macsec_changelink
>
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> 2022-12-07, 15:52:15 +0000, Emeel Hakim wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, 7 December 2022 17:46
> > > To: Emeel Hakim <ehakim@...dia.com>
> > > Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Raed Salem <raeds@...dia.com>;
> > > davem@...emloft.net; edumazet@...gle.com; kuba@...nel.org;
> > > pabeni@...hat.com; netdev@...r.kernel.org; atenart@...nel.org;
> > > jiri@...nulli.us
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] macsec: add support for
> > > IFLA_MACSEC_OFFLOAD in macsec_changelink
> > >
> > > External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
> > >
> > >
> > > 2022-12-07, 12:10:16 +0200, ehakim@...dia.com wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > +static int macsec_changelink_upd_offload(struct net_device *dev,
> > > > +struct nlattr *data[]) {
> > > > + enum macsec_offload offload;
> > > > + struct macsec_dev *macsec;
> > > > +
> > > > + macsec = macsec_priv(dev);
> > > > + offload = nla_get_u8(data[IFLA_MACSEC_OFFLOAD]);
> > >
> > > All those checks are also present in macsec_upd_offload, why not
> > > move them into macsec_update_offload as well? (and then you don't
> > > really need macsec_changelink_upd_offload anymore)
> > >
> >
> > Right, I thought about it , but I realized that those checks are done
> > before holding the lock in macsec_upd_offload and if I move them to
> > macsec_update_offload I will hold the lock for a longer time , I want to minimize
> the time of holding the lock.
>
> Those couple of tests are probably lost in the noise compared to what
> mdo_add_secy ends up doing. It also looks like a race condition between the
> "macsec->offload == offload" test in macsec_upd_offload (outside rtnl_lock) and
> updating macsec->offload via macsec_changelink is possible. (Currently we can
> only change it with macsec_upd_offload (called under genl_lock) so there's no issue
> until we add this patch)
Ack,
so getting rid of macsec_changelink_upd_offload and moving the locking inside macsec_update_offload
should handle this issue
>
> > > > + if (macsec->offload == offload)
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > +
> > > > + /* Check if the offloading mode is supported by the underlying layers */
> > > > + if (offload != MACSEC_OFFLOAD_OFF &&
> > > > + !macsec_check_offload(offload, macsec))
> > > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > > +
> > > > + /* Check if the net device is busy. */
> > > > + if (netif_running(dev))
> > > > + return -EBUSY;
> > > > +
> > > > + return macsec_update_offload(macsec, offload); }
> > > > +
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sabrina
> >
>
> --
> Sabrina
Powered by blists - more mailing lists