lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202212080912066313234@zte.com.cn>
Date:   Thu, 8 Dec 2022 09:12:06 +0800 (CST)
From:   <yang.yang29@....com.cn>
To:     <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     <edumazet@...gle.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        <bigeasy@...utronix.de>, <imagedong@...cent.com>,
        <kuniyu@...zon.com>, <petrm@...dia.com>, <liu3101@...due.edu>,
        <wujianguo@...natelecom.cn>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <tedheadster@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] net: record times of netdev_budget exhausted

> In my experience - no this is not useful.

Received, thanks!

> Sorry if this is too direct, but it seems to me like you're trying hard
> to find something useful to do in this area without a clear use case. 
I see maybe this is a too special scenes, not suitable. The motivation
is we see lots of time_squeeze on our working machines, and want to
tuning, but our kernel are not ready to use threaded NAPI. And we
did see performance difference on different netdev_budget* in
preliminary tests.

> We have coding tasks which would definitely be useful and which nobody
> has time to accomplish. Please ask if you're trying to find something
> to do.

We focus on 5G telecom machine, which has huge TIPC packets in the
intranet. If it's related, we are glad to do it with much appreciate of your
indicate!

Thanks.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ