[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y5GxlPuH9b7B5AEy@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2022 09:42:44 +0000
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, tj@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
zhiquan1.li@...el.com, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/18] x86/sgx: Prepare for multiple LRUs
On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 10:36:47AM -0800, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
> From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
>
> Add sgx_can_reclaim() wrapper so that in a subsequent patch, multiple LRUs
> can be used cleanly.
Nit: Patch is the transient form of a change. Once a change has been
committed, it is a commit.
Further, you should instead explain why subsequent changes require
sgx_can_reclaim() wrapper, than just claim it without argument.
Alternatively, you can consider squashing this to the subsequent
patch, which makes use of the wrapper.
BR, Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists