| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20221208104351.35038-5-paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2022 11:43:47 +0100
From: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
arie.vanderhoeven@...gate.com, rory.c.chen@...gate.com,
glen.valante@...aro.org, Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>,
Gabriele Felici <felicigb@...il.com>,
Gianmarco Lusvardi <glusvardi@...teo.net>,
Giulio Barabino <giuliobarabino99@...il.com>,
Emiliano Maccaferri <inbox@...lianomaccaferri.com>
Subject: [PATCH V9 4/8] block, bfq: turn bfqq_data into an array in bfq_io_cq
When a bfq_queue Q is merged with another queue, several pieces of
information are saved about Q. These pieces are stored in the
bfqq_data field in the bfq_io_cq data structure of the process
associated with Q.
Yet, with a multi-actuator drive, a process may get associated with
multiple bfq_queues: one queue for each of the N actuators. Each of
these queues may undergo a merge. So, the bfq_io_cq data structure
must be able to accommodate the above information for N queues.
This commit solves this problem by turning the bfqq_data scalar field
into an array of N elements (and by changing code so as to handle
this array).
This solution is written under the assumption that bfq_queues
associated with different actuators cannot be cross-merged. This
assumption holds naturally with basic queue merging: the latter is
triggered by spatial locality, and sectors for different actuators are
not close to each other (apart from the corner case of the last
sectors served by a given actuator and the first sectors served by the
next actuator). As for stable cross-merging, the assumption here is
that it is disabled.
Signed-off-by: Gabriele Felici <felicigb@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Gianmarco Lusvardi <glusvardi@...teo.net>
Signed-off-by: Giulio Barabino <giuliobarabino99@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Emiliano Maccaferri <inbox@...lianomaccaferri.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>
---
block/bfq-iosched.c | 95 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
block/bfq-iosched.h | 12 ++++--
2 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
index 0d6b35ef3d3f..18e2b8f75435 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
@@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ void bic_set_bfqq(struct bfq_io_cq *bic,
* we cancel the stable merge if
* bic->stable_merge_bfqq == bfqq.
*/
- struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data *bfqq_data = &bic->bfqq_data;
+ struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data *bfqq_data = &bic->bfqq_data[actuator_idx];
if (is_sync)
bic->bfqq[1][actuator_idx] = bfqq;
@@ -1181,9 +1181,10 @@ static void
bfq_bfqq_resume_state(struct bfq_queue *bfqq, struct bfq_data *bfqd,
struct bfq_io_cq *bic, bool bfq_already_existing)
{
- struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data *bfqq_data = &bic->bfqq_data;
unsigned int old_wr_coeff = 1;
bool busy = bfq_already_existing && bfq_bfqq_busy(bfqq);
+ unsigned int a_idx = bfqq->actuator_idx;
+ struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data *bfqq_data = &bic->bfqq_data[a_idx];
if (bfqq_data->saved_has_short_ttime)
bfq_mark_bfqq_has_short_ttime(bfqq);
@@ -1899,7 +1900,9 @@ static void bfq_bfqq_handle_idle_busy_switch(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
wr_or_deserves_wr = bfqd->low_latency &&
(bfqq->wr_coeff > 1 ||
(bfq_bfqq_sync(bfqq) &&
- (bfqq->bic || RQ_BIC(rq)->bfqq_data.stably_merged) &&
+ (bfqq->bic ||
+ RQ_BIC(rq)->bfqq_data[bfq_actuator_index(bfqd, rq->bio)]
+ .stably_merged) &&
(*interactive || soft_rt)));
/*
@@ -2888,6 +2891,35 @@ static bool bfq_may_be_close_cooperator(struct bfq_queue *bfqq,
static bool idling_boosts_thr_without_issues(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
struct bfq_queue *bfqq);
+static struct bfq_queue *
+bfq_setup_stable_merge(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq,
+ struct bfq_queue *stable_merge_bfqq,
+ struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data *bfqq_data)
+{
+ int proc_ref = min(bfqq_process_refs(bfqq),
+ bfqq_process_refs(stable_merge_bfqq));
+
+ if (!idling_boosts_thr_without_issues(bfqd, bfqq) &&
+ proc_ref > 0) {
+ /* next function will take at least one ref */
+ struct bfq_queue *new_bfqq =
+ bfq_setup_merge(bfqq, stable_merge_bfqq);
+
+ if (new_bfqq) {
+ bfqq_data->stably_merged = true;
+ if (new_bfqq->bic) {
+ unsigned int new_a_idx = new_bfqq->actuator_idx;
+ struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data *new_bfqq_data =
+ &new_bfqq->bic->bfqq_data[new_a_idx];
+
+ new_bfqq_data->stably_merged = true;
+ }
+ }
+ return new_bfqq;
+ } else
+ return NULL;
+}
+
/*
* Attempt to schedule a merge of bfqq with the currently in-service
* queue or with a close queue among the scheduled queues. Return
@@ -2913,7 +2945,8 @@ bfq_setup_cooperator(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq,
void *io_struct, bool request, struct bfq_io_cq *bic)
{
struct bfq_queue *in_service_bfqq, *new_bfqq;
- struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data *bfqq_data = &bic->bfqq_data;
+ unsigned int a_idx = bfqq->actuator_idx;
+ struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data *bfqq_data = &bic->bfqq_data[a_idx];
/* if a merge has already been setup, then proceed with that first */
if (bfqq->new_bfqq)
@@ -2943,29 +2976,15 @@ bfq_setup_cooperator(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq,
msecs_to_jiffies(bfq_late_stable_merging))) {
struct bfq_queue *stable_merge_bfqq =
bfqq_data->stable_merge_bfqq;
- int proc_ref = min(bfqq_process_refs(bfqq),
- bfqq_process_refs(stable_merge_bfqq));
/* deschedule stable merge, because done or aborted here */
bfq_put_stable_ref(stable_merge_bfqq);
bfqq_data->stable_merge_bfqq = NULL;
- if (!idling_boosts_thr_without_issues(bfqd, bfqq) &&
- proc_ref > 0) {
- /* next function will take at least one ref */
- struct bfq_queue *new_bfqq =
- bfq_setup_merge(bfqq, stable_merge_bfqq);
-
- if (new_bfqq) {
- bfqq_data->stably_merged = true;
- if (new_bfqq->bic)
- new_bfqq->bic->bfqq_data.stably_merged =
- true;
- }
- return new_bfqq;
- } else
- return NULL;
+ return bfq_setup_stable_merge(bfqd, bfqq,
+ stable_merge_bfqq,
+ bfqq_data);
}
}
@@ -3060,7 +3079,8 @@ bfq_setup_cooperator(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq,
static void bfq_bfqq_save_state(struct bfq_queue *bfqq)
{
struct bfq_io_cq *bic = bfqq->bic;
- struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data *bfqq_data = &bic->bfqq_data;
+ unsigned int a_idx = bfqq->actuator_idx;
+ struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data *bfqq_data = &bic->bfqq_data[a_idx];
/*
* If !bfqq->bic, the queue is already shared or its requests
@@ -3071,7 +3091,7 @@ static void bfq_bfqq_save_state(struct bfq_queue *bfqq)
return;
bfqq_data->saved_last_serv_time_ns = bfqq->last_serv_time_ns;
- bfqq_data->saved_inject_limit = bfqq->inject_limit;
+ bfqq_data->saved_inject_limit = bfqq->inject_limit;
bfqq_data->saved_decrease_time_jif = bfqq->decrease_time_jif;
bfqq_data->saved_weight = bfqq->entity.orig_weight;
@@ -5438,7 +5458,7 @@ static void bfq_exit_icq(struct io_cq *icq)
* therefore on its unused per-actuator fields being NULL.
*/
unsigned int num_actuators = BFQ_MAX_ACTUATORS;
- struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data *bfqq_data = &bic->bfqq_data;
+ struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data *bfqq_data = bic->bfqq_data;
/*
* bfqd is NULL if scheduler already exited, and in that case
@@ -5449,10 +5469,10 @@ static void bfq_exit_icq(struct io_cq *icq)
num_actuators = bfqd->num_actuators;
}
- if (bfqq_data->stable_merge_bfqq)
- bfq_put_stable_ref(bfqq_data->stable_merge_bfqq);
-
for (act_idx = 0; act_idx < num_actuators; act_idx++) {
+ if (bfqq_data[act_idx].stable_merge_bfqq)
+ bfq_put_stable_ref(bfqq_data[act_idx].stable_merge_bfqq);
+
bfq_exit_icq_bfqq(bic, true, act_idx);
bfq_exit_icq_bfqq(bic, false, act_idx);
}
@@ -5639,16 +5659,16 @@ bfq_do_early_stable_merge(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq,
struct bfq_io_cq *bic,
struct bfq_queue *last_bfqq_created)
{
+ unsigned int a_idx = last_bfqq_created->actuator_idx;
struct bfq_queue *new_bfqq =
bfq_setup_merge(bfqq, last_bfqq_created);
- struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data *bfqq_data = &bic->bfqq_data;
if (!new_bfqq)
return bfqq;
if (new_bfqq->bic)
- new_bfqq->bic->bfqq_data.stably_merged = true;
- bfqq_data->stably_merged = true;
+ new_bfqq->bic->bfqq_data[a_idx].stably_merged = true;
+ bic->bfqq_data[a_idx].stably_merged = true;
/*
* Reusing merge functions. This implies that
@@ -5717,7 +5737,6 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_do_or_sched_stable_merge(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
&bfqd->last_bfqq_created;
struct bfq_queue *last_bfqq_created = *source_bfqq;
- struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data *bfqq_data = &bic->bfqq_data;
/*
* If last_bfqq_created has not been set yet, then init it. If
@@ -5779,7 +5798,8 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_do_or_sched_stable_merge(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
/*
* Record the bfqq to merge to.
*/
- bfqq_data->stable_merge_bfqq = last_bfqq_created;
+ bic->bfqq_data[last_bfqq_created->actuator_idx].stable_merge_bfqq =
+ last_bfqq_created;
}
}
@@ -6699,7 +6719,7 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_get_bfqq_handle_split(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
{
unsigned int act_idx = bfq_actuator_index(bfqd, bio);
struct bfq_queue *bfqq = bic_to_bfqq(bic, is_sync, act_idx);
- struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data *bfqq_data = &bic->bfqq_data;
+ struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data *bfqq_data = &bic->bfqq_data[act_idx];
if (likely(bfqq && bfqq != &bfqd->oom_bfqq))
return bfqq;
@@ -6807,7 +6827,7 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_init_rq(struct request *rq)
struct bfq_queue *bfqq;
bool new_queue = false;
bool bfqq_already_existing = false, split = false;
- struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data *bfqq_data;
+ unsigned int a_idx = bfq_actuator_index(bfqd, bio);
if (unlikely(!rq->elv.icq))
return NULL;
@@ -6831,17 +6851,16 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_init_rq(struct request *rq)
bfqq = bfq_get_bfqq_handle_split(bfqd, bic, bio, false, is_sync,
&new_queue);
- bfqq_data = &bic->bfqq_data;
-
if (likely(!new_queue)) {
/* If the queue was seeky for too long, break it apart. */
if (bfq_bfqq_coop(bfqq) && bfq_bfqq_split_coop(bfqq) &&
- !bfqq_data->stably_merged) {
+ !bic->bfqq_data[a_idx].stably_merged) {
struct bfq_queue *old_bfqq = bfqq;
/* Update bic before losing reference to bfqq */
if (bfq_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq))
- bfqq_data->saved_in_large_burst = true;
+ bic->bfqq_data[a_idx].saved_in_large_burst =
+ true;
bfqq = bfq_split_bfqq(bic, bfqq);
split = true;
diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.h b/block/bfq-iosched.h
index 9d77d964620f..a685aa32b037 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.h
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.h
@@ -416,7 +416,7 @@ struct bfq_queue {
struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data {
/*
* Snapshot of the has_short_time flag before merging; taken
- * to remember its value while the queue is merged, so as to
+ * to remember its values while the queue is merged, so as to
* be able to restore it in case of split.
*/
bool saved_has_short_ttime;
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data {
u64 saved_tot_idle_time;
/*
- * Same purpose as the previous fields for the value of the
+ * Same purpose as the previous fields for the values of the
* field keeping the queue's belonging to a large burst
*/
bool saved_in_large_burst;
@@ -493,8 +493,12 @@ struct bfq_io_cq {
uint64_t blkcg_serial_nr; /* the current blkcg serial */
#endif
- /* persistent data for associated synchronous process queue */
- struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data bfqq_data;
+ /*
+ * Persistent data for associated synchronous process queues
+ * (one queue per actuator, see field bfqq above). In
+ * particular, each of these queues may undergo a merge.
+ */
+ struct bfq_iocq_bfqq_data bfqq_data[BFQ_MAX_ACTUATORS];
unsigned int requests; /* Number of requests this process has in flight */
};
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists