lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 08 Dec 2022 13:14:26 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, Kris Bahnsen <kris@...eddedTS.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mark@...eddedTS.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-gpio: Don't set MOSI as an input if not 3WIRE mode

On Wed, 07 Dec 2022 15:08:53 -0800, Kris Bahnsen wrote:
> The addition of 3WIRE support would affect MOSI direction even
> when still in standard (4 wire) mode. This can lead to MOSI being
> at an invalid logic level when a device driver sets an SPI
> message with a NULL tx_buf.
> 
> spi.h states that if tx_buf is NULL then "zeros will be shifted
> out ... " If MOSI is tristated then the data shifted out is subject
> to pull resistors, keepers, or in the absence of those, noise.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] spi: spi-gpio: Don't set MOSI as an input if not 3WIRE mode
      commit: 3a6f994f848a69deb2bf3cd9d130dd0c09730e55

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ