[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f0660569-46f6-e0cd-1a33-4d1381c3c59e@quicinc.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2022 21:01:41 +0530
From: Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo@...cinc.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
CC: freedreno <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
"Konrad Dybcio" <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/6] clk/qcom: Support gdsc collapse polling using
'reset' interface
On 12/7/2022 9:30 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 at 23:57, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 02:36:58PM +0530, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
>> @Ulf, Akhil has a power-domain for a piece of hardware which may be
>> voted active by multiple different subsystems (co-processors/execution
>> contexts) in the system.
>>
>> As such, during the powering down sequence we don't wait for the
>> power-domain to turn off. But in the event of an error, the recovery
>> mechanism relies on waiting for the hardware to settle in a powered off
>> state.
>>
>> The proposal here is to use the reset framework to wait for this state
>> to be reached, before continuing with the recovery mechanism in the
>> client driver.
> I tried to review the series (see my other replies), but I am not sure
> I fully understand the consumer part.
>
> More exactly, when and who is going to pull the reset and at what point?
Explained in the other patch.
-Akhil.
>
>> Given our other discussions on quirky behavior, do you have any
>> input/suggestions on this?
>>
>>> Some clients like adreno gpu driver would like to ensure that its gdsc
>>> is collapsed at hardware during a gpu reset sequence. This is because it
>>> has a votable gdsc which could be ON due to a vote from another subsystem
>>> like tz, hyp etc or due to an internal hardware signal. To allow
>>> this, gpucc driver can expose an interface to the client driver using
>>> reset framework. Using this the client driver can trigger a polling within
>>> the gdsc driver.
>> @Akhil, this description is fairly generic. As we've reached the state
>> where the hardware has settled and we return to the client, what
>> prevents it from being powered up again?
>>
>> Or is it simply a question of it hitting the powered-off state, not
>> necessarily staying there?
> Okay, so it's indeed the GPU driver that is going to assert/de-assert
> the reset at some point. Right?
>
> That seems like a reasonable approach to me, even if it's a bit
> unclear under what conditions that could happen.
>
> [...]
>
> Kind regards
> Uffe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists