[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <MN0PR12MB61017B3409E33ED7EF3FBA0DE21D9@MN0PR12MB6101.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2022 16:46:37 +0000
From: "Limonciello, Mario" <Mario.Limonciello@....com>
To: "Yuan, Perry" <Perry.Yuan@....com>,
"Huang, Ray" <Ray.Huang@....com>
CC: "rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"viresh.kumar@...aro.org" <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
"Sharma, Deepak" <Deepak.Sharma@....com>,
"Fontenot, Nathan" <Nathan.Fontenot@....com>,
"Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@....com>,
"Huang, Shimmer" <Shimmer.Huang@....com>,
"Du, Xiaojian" <Xiaojian.Du@....com>,
"Meng, Li (Jassmine)" <Li.Meng@....com>,
"Karny, Wyes" <Wyes.Karny@....com>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 03/11] cpufreq: intel_pstate: use common macro
definition for Energy Preference Performance(EPP)
[Public]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yuan, Perry <Perry.Yuan@....com>
> Sent: Thursday, December 8, 2022 08:40
> To: Limonciello, Mario <Mario.Limonciello@....com>; Huang, Ray
> <Ray.Huang@....com>
> Cc: rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com; viresh.kumar@...aro.org; Sharma, Deepak
> <Deepak.Sharma@....com>; Fontenot, Nathan
> <Nathan.Fontenot@....com>; Deucher, Alexander
> <Alexander.Deucher@....com>; Huang, Shimmer
> <Shimmer.Huang@....com>; Du, Xiaojian <Xiaojian.Du@....com>; Meng,
> Li (Jassmine) <Li.Meng@....com>; Karny, Wyes <Wyes.Karny@....com>;
> linux-pm@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 03/11] cpufreq: intel_pstate: use common macro
> definition for Energy Preference Performance(EPP)
>
> [Public]
>
> Hi Mario.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Limonciello, Mario <Mario.Limonciello@....com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 12:45 AM
> > To: Yuan, Perry <Perry.Yuan@....com>; Huang, Ray
> <Ray.Huang@....com>
> > Cc: rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com; viresh.kumar@...aro.org; Sharma, Deepak
> > <Deepak.Sharma@....com>; Fontenot, Nathan
> > <Nathan.Fontenot@....com>; Deucher, Alexander
> > <Alexander.Deucher@....com>; Huang, Shimmer
> > <Shimmer.Huang@....com>; Du, Xiaojian <Xiaojian.Du@....com>;
> Meng,
> > Li (Jassmine) <Li.Meng@....com>; Karny, Wyes
> <Wyes.Karny@....com>;
> > linux-pm@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 03/11] cpufreq: intel_pstate: use common macro
> > definition for Energy Preference Performance(EPP)
> >
> > [Public]
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Yuan, Perry <Perry.Yuan@....com>
> > > Sent: Monday, December 5, 2022 08:41
> > > To: Huang, Ray <Ray.Huang@....com>
> > > Cc: rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com; Limonciello, Mario
> > > <Mario.Limonciello@....com>; viresh.kumar@...aro.org; Sharma,
> Deepak
> > > <Deepak.Sharma@....com>; Fontenot, Nathan
> > <Nathan.Fontenot@....com>;
> > > Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@....com>; Huang, Shimmer
> > > <Shimmer.Huang@....com>; Du, Xiaojian <Xiaojian.Du@....com>;
> > Meng, Li
> > > (Jassmine) <Li.Meng@....com>; Karny, Wyes
> <Wyes.Karny@....com>;
> > > linux-pm@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> > > Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 03/11] cpufreq: intel_pstate: use common macro
> > > definition for Energy Preference Performance(EPP)
> > >
> > > [AMD Official Use Only - General]
> > >
> > > Hi Ray.
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Huang, Ray <Ray.Huang@....com>
> > > > Sent: Monday, December 5, 2022 7:49 PM
> > > > To: Yuan, Perry <Perry.Yuan@....com>
> > > > Cc: rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com; Limonciello, Mario
> > > > <Mario.Limonciello@....com>; viresh.kumar@...aro.org; Sharma,
> > Deepak
> > > > <Deepak.Sharma@....com>; Fontenot, Nathan
> > <Nathan.Fontenot@....com>;
> > > > Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@....com>; Huang,
> Shimmer
> > > > <Shimmer.Huang@....com>; Du, Xiaojian <Xiaojian.Du@....com>;
> > > Meng,
> > > > Li (Jassmine) <Li.Meng@....com>; Karny, Wyes
> > > <Wyes.Karny@....com>;
> > > > linux-pm@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 03/11] cpufreq: intel_pstate: use common
> > > > macro definition for Energy Preference Performance(EPP)
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 03:47:11PM +0800, Yuan, Perry wrote:
> > > > > make the energy preference performance strings and profiles using
> > > > > one common header for intel_pstate driver, then the amd_pstate
> epp
> > > > > driver can use the common header as well. This will simpify the
> > > > > intel_pstate and amd_pstate driver.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@....com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 4 ---
> > > > > drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 37 +--------------------
> > > > > include/linux/cpufreq_common.h | 56
> > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >
> > > > I don't find any specific reason why you have to use another common
> > > > cpufreq_common header instead of include/linux/cpufreq.h.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Ray
> > >
> > > That is fine for me to use the cpufreq.h to store the common vars.
> > > I will move the declaration to that header file.
> > >
> > > Thanks for the review.
> > >
> > > Perry.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > 3 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) create mode
> > > > > 100644 include/linux/cpufreq_common.h
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> > > > > b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> > > > > index 4a2af82553e4..3983378cff5b 100644
> > > > > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> > > > > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> > > > > @@ -472,10 +472,6 @@
> > > > > #define HWP_MAX_PERF(x) ((x & 0xff) << 8)
> > > > > #define HWP_DESIRED_PERF(x) ((x & 0xff) << 16)
> > > > > #define HWP_ENERGY_PERF_PREFERENCE(x) (((unsigned long long)
> > > > x & 0xff) << 24)
> > > > > -#define HWP_EPP_PERFORMANCE 0x00
> > > > > -#define HWP_EPP_BALANCE_PERFORMANCE 0x80
> > > > > -#define HWP_EPP_BALANCE_POWERSAVE 0xC0
> > > > > -#define HWP_EPP_POWERSAVE 0xFF
> > > > > #define HWP_ACTIVITY_WINDOW(x) ((unsigned long
> > > > long)(x & 0xff3) << 32)
> > > > > #define HWP_PACKAGE_CONTROL(x) ((unsigned long
> > > > long)(x & 0x1) << 42)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> > > > > b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c index ad9be31753b6..65036ca21719
> > > > > 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> > > > > @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
> > > > > #include <linux/acpi.h>
> > > > > #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
> > > > > #include <linux/pm_qos.h>
> > > > > +#include <linux/cpufreq_common.h>
> > > > > #include <trace/events/power.h>
> > > > >
> > > > > #include <asm/cpu.h>
> > > > > @@ -628,42 +629,6 @@ static int intel_pstate_set_epb(int cpu, s16
> pref)
> > > > > return 0;
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > -/*
> > > > > - * EPP/EPB display strings corresponding to EPP index in the
> > > > > - * energy_perf_strings[]
> > > > > - * index String
> > > > > - *-------------------------------------
> > > > > - * 0 default
> > > > > - * 1 performance
> > > > > - * 2 balance_performance
> > > > > - * 3 balance_power
> > > > > - * 4 power
> > > > > - */
> > > > > -
> > > > > -enum energy_perf_value_index {
> > > > > - EPP_INDEX_DEFAULT = 0,
> > > > > - EPP_INDEX_PERFORMANCE,
> > > > > - EPP_INDEX_BALANCE_PERFORMANCE,
> > > > > - EPP_INDEX_BALANCE_POWERSAVE,
> > > > > - EPP_INDEX_POWERSAVE,
> > > > > -};
> > > > > -
> > > > > -static const char * const energy_perf_strings[] = {
> > > > > - [EPP_INDEX_DEFAULT] = "default",
> > > > > - [EPP_INDEX_PERFORMANCE] = "performance",
> > > > > - [EPP_INDEX_BALANCE_PERFORMANCE] =
> "balance_performance",
> > > > > - [EPP_INDEX_BALANCE_POWERSAVE] = "balance_power",
> > > > > - [EPP_INDEX_POWERSAVE] = "power",
> > > > > - NULL
> > > > > -};
> > > > > -static unsigned int epp_values[] = {
> > > > > - [EPP_INDEX_DEFAULT] = 0, /* Unused index */
> > > > > - [EPP_INDEX_PERFORMANCE] = HWP_EPP_PERFORMANCE,
> > > > > - [EPP_INDEX_BALANCE_PERFORMANCE] =
> > > > HWP_EPP_BALANCE_PERFORMANCE,
> > > > > - [EPP_INDEX_BALANCE_POWERSAVE] =
> > > > HWP_EPP_BALANCE_POWERSAVE,
> > > > > - [EPP_INDEX_POWERSAVE] = HWP_EPP_POWERSAVE,
> > > > > -};
> > > > > -
> > > > > static int intel_pstate_get_energy_pref_index(struct cpudata
> > > > > *cpu_data, int *raw_epp) {
> > > > > s16 epp;
> > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq_common.h
> > > > > b/include/linux/cpufreq_common.h new file mode 100644 index
> > > > > 000000000000..2d14b0b0f55c
> > > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > > +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq_common.h
> > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
> > > > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> > > > > +/*
> > > > > + * linux/include/linux/cpufreq_common.h
> > > > > + *
> > > > > + * Copyright (C) 2022 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
> > > > > + *
> > > > > + * Author: Perry Yuan <Perry.Yuan@....com> */
> > > > > +
> > > > > +#ifndef _LINUX_CPUFREQ_COMMON_H
> > > > > +#define _LINUX_CPUFREQ_COMMON_H
> > > > > +
> > > > > +#include <asm/msr.h>
> > > > > +/*
> > > > > + * EPP/EPB display strings corresponding to EPP index in the
> > > > > + * energy_perf_strings[]
> > > > > + * index String
> > > > > + *-------------------------------------
> > > > > + * 0 default
> > > > > + * 1 performance
> > > > > + * 2 balance_performance
> > > > > + * 3 balance_power
> > > > > + * 4 power
> > > > > + */
> > > > > +
> > > > > +#define HWP_EPP_PERFORMANCE 0x00
> > > > > +#define HWP_EPP_BALANCE_PERFORMANCE 0x80
> > > > > +#define HWP_EPP_BALANCE_POWERSAVE 0xC0
> > > > > +#define HWP_EPP_POWERSAVE 0xFF
> > > > > +
> > > > > +enum energy_perf_value_index {
> > > > > + EPP_INDEX_DEFAULT = 0,
> > > > > + EPP_INDEX_PERFORMANCE,
> > > > > + EPP_INDEX_BALANCE_PERFORMANCE,
> > > > > + EPP_INDEX_BALANCE_POWERSAVE,
> > > > > + EPP_INDEX_POWERSAVE,
> > > > > +};
> > > > > +
> > > > > +static const char * const energy_perf_strings[] = {
> > > > > + [EPP_INDEX_DEFAULT] = "default",
> > > > > + [EPP_INDEX_PERFORMANCE] = "performance",
> > > > > + [EPP_INDEX_BALANCE_PERFORMANCE] =
> "balance_performance",
> > > > > + [EPP_INDEX_BALANCE_POWERSAVE] = "balance_power",
> > > > > + [EPP_INDEX_POWERSAVE] = "power",
> > > > > + NULL
> > > > > +};
> > > > > +
> > > > > +static unsigned int epp_values[] = {
> > > > > + [EPP_INDEX_DEFAULT] = 0, /* Unused index */
> > > > > + [EPP_INDEX_PERFORMANCE] = HWP_EPP_PERFORMANCE,
> > > > > + [EPP_INDEX_BALANCE_PERFORMANCE] =
> > > > HWP_EPP_BALANCE_PERFORMANCE,
> > > > > + [EPP_INDEX_BALANCE_POWERSAVE] =
> > > > HWP_EPP_BALANCE_POWERSAVE,
> > > > > + [EPP_INDEX_POWERSAVE] = HWP_EPP_POWERSAVE, };
> > > > > +
> >
> > I don't believe you should be making these static in the header file.
>
> If I do not make these arrays as static type, it will be reporting lots of build
> errors.
>
> ld: drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.o:(.data+0xa0): multiple definition of
> `epp_values'; drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_mem.o:(.data+0x0): first defined here
> ld: drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.o:(.rodata+0x120): multiple definition of
> `energy_perf_strings'; drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_mem.o:(.rodata+0x0): first
> defined here
> ld: drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_ct.o:(.data+0x150): multiple definition of
> `epp_values'; drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_mem.o:(.data+0x0): first defined here
> ld: drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_ct.o:(.rodata+0x60): multiple definition of
> `energy_perf_strings'; drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_mem.o:(.rodata+0x0): first
> defined here
> ld: drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.o:(.data+0x0): multiple definition of
> `epp_values'; drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_mem.o:(.data+0x0): first defined here
> ....
>
>
> I will check how to get this fixed if we really need set it as static in V8.
>
Right; What I think you should do is have in the header (.h) something like
extern int epp_values[];
and then declare the actual definitions in a source file used by all the consumers (.c).
> Perry.
>
> >
> > > > > +#endif /* _LINUX_CPUFREQ_COMMON_H */
> > > > > \ No newline at end of file
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.34.1
> > > > >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists