lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y5PEVoZ0dFIBuuTG@google.com>
Date:   Fri, 9 Dec 2022 15:27:31 -0800
From:   David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>
To:     Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] KVM: x86/MMU: Move rmap_add() to rmap.c

On Tue, Dec 06, 2022 at 05:36:01PM +0000, Ben Gardon wrote:
> Move rmap_add() to rmap.c to complete the migration of the various rmap
> operations out of mmu.c.

IMO rmap_{can_add,add,remove}() should stay in mmu.c since the
implementation of those functions is all Shadow MMU book-keeping that
just needs to be done when the rmap changes.

I would be in favor of giving them more accurate and MMU-related names
though. e.g.

  rmap_can_add() -> kvm_vcpu_can_extend_rmap()
  rmap_add()     -> kvm_mmu_rmap_add()
  rmap_remove()  -> kvm_mmu_rmap_remove()

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ