linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next V10 10/10] riscv: stack: Add config of thread stack size

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJF2gTR+zbuJDQuW+=wEmQjF7xEsMokBW+yvTxXff38VYwSSKA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 9 Dec 2022 10:11:56 +0800
From:   Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
To:     Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>
Cc:     arnd@...db.de, palmer@...osinc.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
        peterz@...radead.org, luto@...nel.org, conor.dooley@...rochip.com,
        heiko@...ech.de, jszhang@...nel.org, lazyparser@...il.com,
        falcon@...ylab.org, chenhuacai@...nel.org, apatel@...tanamicro.com,
        atishp@...shpatra.org, palmer@...belt.com,
        paul.walmsley@...ive.com, mark.rutland@....com,
        zouyipeng@...wei.com, bigeasy@...utronix.de,
        David.Laight@...lab.com, chenzhongjin@...wei.com,
        greentime.hu@...ive.com, andy.chiu@...ive.com, ben@...adent.org.uk,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next V10 10/10] riscv: stack: Add config of thread stack size

On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 6:12 PM Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> guoren@...nel.org writes:
>
> > From: Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
> >
> > 0cac21b02ba5 ("risc v: use 16KB kernel stack on 64-bit") increase the
>
> checkpatch complains here: Use "commit SHA...".
Okay, I would check that.

>
> > thread size mandatory, but some scenarios, such as D1 with a small
> > memory footprint, would suffer from that. After independent irq stack
> > support, let's give users a choice to determine their custom stack size.
>
> ...and again, my "why is this in the generic entry" series rant. :-)
I would remove it from the generic entry series.

>
>
> Björn



-- 
Best Regards
 Guo Ren