| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2022 08:48:32 +0800
From: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@...ux.dev>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: syzbot <syzbot+3fd8326d9a0812d19218@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
jgg@...pe.ca, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, markzhang@...dia.com,
ohartoov@...dia.com, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] WARNING: refcount bug in nldev_newlink
On 12/8/22 7:54 PM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 07:42:18PM +0800, Guoqing Jiang wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 12/8/22 5:14 PM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 12:51:39PM -0800, syzbot wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> syzbot found the following issue on:
>>>>
>>>> HEAD commit: 591cd61541b9 Add linux-next specific files for 20221207
>>>> git tree: linux-next
>>>> console+strace: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=11aeafad880000
>>>> kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=8b2d3e63e054c24f
>>>> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=3fd8326d9a0812d19218
>>>> compiler: gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2
>>>> syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=112536fb880000
>>>> C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=16aa2e6d880000
>>>>
>>>> Downloadable assets:
>>>> disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/bc862c01ec56/disk-591cd615.raw.xz
>>>> vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/8f9b93f8ed2f/vmlinux-591cd615.xz
>>>> kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/9d5cb636d548/bzImage-591cd615.xz
>>>>
>>>> IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
>>>> Reported-by: syzbot+3fd8326d9a0812d19218@...kaller.appspotmail.com
>>>>
>>>> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 5156 at lib/refcount.c:31 refcount_warn_saturate+0x1d7/0x1f0 lib/refcount.c:31
>>>> Modules linked in:
>>>> CPU: 0 PID: 5156 Comm: syz-executor773 Not tainted 6.1.0-rc8-next-20221207-syzkaller #0
>>>> Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/26/2022
>>>> RIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0x1d7/0x1f0 lib/refcount.c:31
>>>> Code: 05 5a 60 51 0a 01 e8 35 0a b5 05 0f 0b e9 d3 fe ff ff e8 6c 9b 75 fd 48 c7 c7 c0 6d a6 8a c6 05 37 60 51 0a 01 e8 16 0a b5 05 <0f> 0b e9 b4 fe ff ff 48 89 ef e8 5a b5 c3 fd e9 5c fe ff ff 0f 1f
>>>> RSP: 0018:ffffc90003ebf0d8 EFLAGS: 00010286
>>>> RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000
>>>> RDX: ffff88802bfcba80 RSI: ffffffff8166b1dc RDI: fffff520007d7e0d
>>>> RBP: ffff888070296600 R08: 0000000000000005 R09: 0000000000000000
>>>> R10: 0000000080000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 1ffff920007d7e20
>>>> R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff888070296600 R15: ffffc90003ebf608
>>>> FS: 000055555600f300(0000) GS:ffff8880b9800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>>>> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>>>> CR2: 00007ffed185b004 CR3: 00000000265db000 CR4: 00000000003506f0
>>>> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
>>>> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
>>>> Call Trace:
>>>> <TASK>
>>>> __refcount_dec include/linux/refcount.h:344 [inline]
>>>> refcount_dec include/linux/refcount.h:359 [inline]
>>>> ref_tracker_free+0x539/0x6b0 lib/ref_tracker.c:118
>>>> netdev_tracker_free include/linux/netdevice.h:4039 [inline]
>>>> netdev_put include/linux/netdevice.h:4056 [inline]
>>>> dev_put include/linux/netdevice.h:4082 [inline]
>>>> nldev_newlink+0x360/0x5d0 drivers/infiniband/core/nldev.c:1733
>>>> rdma_nl_rcv_msg+0x371/0x6a0 drivers/infiniband/core/netlink.c:195
>>>> rdma_nl_rcv_skb.constprop.0.isra.0+0x2fc/0x440 drivers/infiniband/core/netlink.c:239
>>>> netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1330 [inline]
>>>> netlink_unicast+0x547/0x7f0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1356
>>>> netlink_sendmsg+0x91b/0xe10 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1932
>>>> sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:714 [inline]
>>>> sock_sendmsg+0xd3/0x120 net/socket.c:734
>>>> ____sys_sendmsg+0x712/0x8c0 net/socket.c:2476
>>>> ___sys_sendmsg+0x110/0x1b0 net/socket.c:2530
>>>> __sys_sendmsg+0xf7/0x1c0 net/socket.c:2559
>>>> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
>>>> do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
>>>> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
>>>> RIP: 0033:0x7fd5bc473699
>>>> Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 41 15 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 c0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
>>>> RSP: 002b:00007ffed185aff8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e
>>>> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007fd5bc473699
>>>> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000020000340 RDI: 0000000000000003
>>>> RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 000000000000000d R09: 000000000000000d
>>>> R10: 00007ffed185aa70 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007ffed185b010
>>>> R13: 00000000000f4240 R14: 0000000000011fc1 R15: 00007ffed185b004
>>>> </TASK>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
>>>> See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
>>>> syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@...glegroups.com.
>>>>
>>>> syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
>>>> https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
>>>> syzbot can test patches for this issue, for details see:
>>>> https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#testing-patches
>>> Jason, what do you think?
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/nldev.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/nldev.c
>>> index a981ac2f0975..982938c1dae3 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/nldev.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/nldev.c
>>> @@ -1730,7 +1730,8 @@ static int nldev_newlink(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
>>> #endif
>>> err = ops ? ops->newlink(ibdev_name, ndev) : -EINVAL;
>>> up_read(&link_ops_rwsem);
>>> - dev_put(ndev);
>>> + if (err)
>>> + dev_put(ndev);
>>> return err;
>>> }
>>>
>> I guess the dev_put is paired with dev_hold in dev_get_by_name,
> Yes, my concern is that call to ->delink() calls to dev_put
> unconditionally in free_netdevs() and I didn't see who called
> to dev_hold() except dev_get_by_name.
My understanding is ops->newlink (either rxe_newlink or siw_newlink)
triggers dev_hold eventually which paired with dev_put in free_netdevs.
Thanks,
Guoqing
Powered by blists - more mailing lists