linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] add s390 support to nolibc and rcutorture

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 9 Dec 2022 16:28:35 +0100
From:   Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc:     Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] add s390 support to nolibc and rcutorture

On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 07:03:25AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 03:19:34PM +0100, Sven Schnelle wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > these patches add support for the s390 architecture both to nolibc
> > and rcutorture. Note that this only adds support for the 64 bit
> > version, no support for 31 bit (compat) is added. For nolibc it
> > includes one bugfix to make the fd_set datatype match the kernel
> > type.
> 
> Nice!!!

indeed :-)

> The rcutorture patches look plausible to me, but I must defer to Willy
> Tarreau on the nolibc changes.

I had a very quick glance over them and nothing shocked me. I just want
to double-check the u32->long conversion with a careful eye but I'm happy
to see that your rcutorture binary continues its diet on more and more
architectures ;-)

Cheers,
Willy