lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1e6c1b08-d573-fba9-61fd-d40a74427d46@oracle.com>
Date:   Fri, 9 Dec 2022 14:32:15 -0500
From:   Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
To:     Krister Johansen <kjlx@...pleofstupid.com>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
        Anthony Liguori <aliguori@...zon.com>,
        David Reaver <me@...idreaver.com>,
        Brendan Gregg <brendan@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] x86/xen/time: prefer tsc as clocksource when
 it is invariant


On 12/8/22 11:36 AM, Krister Johansen wrote:
> +	/*
> +	 * As Dom0 is never moved, no penalty on using TSC there.
> +	 *
> +	 * If the guest has invariant tsc, then set xen_clocksource rating
> +	 * below that of the tsc so that the system prefers tsc instead.  This
> +	 * check excludes PV domains, because PV is unable to guarantee that the
> +	 * guest's cpuid call has been intercepted by the hypervisor.
> +	 */
> +	if (xen_initial_domain()) {
>   		xen_clocksource.rating = 275;
> +	} else if ((xen_hvm_domain() || xen_pvh_domain()) &&
> +	    boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC) &&
> +	    boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC) &&
> +	    !check_tsc_unstable()) {
> +		xen_clocksource.rating = 299;
> +	}


What if RDTSC is intercepted?


-boris

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ