linux-kernel - Re: [PULL] Networking for v6.1 final / v6.1-rc9 (with the diff stat :S)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20221209130001.0f90f7f8@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 9 Dec 2022 13:00:01 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PULL] Networking for v6.1 final / v6.1-rc9 (with the diff stat
 :S)

On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 10:25:09 -0800 Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > There is an outstanding regression in BPF / Peter's static calls stuff,  
> 
> Looks like it's not related to the static calls. Jiri says that
> reverting that static call change makes no difference, and currently
> suspects a RCU race instead:
> 
>   https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/Y5M9P95l85oMHki9@krava/T/#t
> 
> Hmm?

Yes. I can't quickly grok how the static call changes impacted 
the locking. I'll poke the BPF people to give us a sense of urgency.
IDK how likely it is to get hold of Peter Z..