[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <547e58b1-942e-8beb-29a2-3920184c46a0@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2022 20:08:39 +0800
From: Yuwei Guan <ssawgyw@...il.com>
To: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>, jaegeuk@...nel.org
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Yuwei.Guan@...krlife.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: continuous counting for 'issued' in
__issue_discard_cmd_orderly()
在 2022/12/11 10:36, Chao Yu 写道:
> On 2022/11/22 0:11, Yuwei Guan wrote:
>> As the 'dcc->discard_granularity' and 'dcc->max_ordered_discard' can
>> be set
>> at the user space, and if the 'dcc->max_ordered_discard' is set larger
>> than
>> 'dcc->discard_granularity' in DPOLICY_BG mode, or it's a volume device,
>> discard_granularity can be tuned to 1 in f2fs_tuning_parameters(),
>> it will may send more requests than the number of 'dpolicy->max_requests'
>> in issue_discard_thread().
>>
>> This patch will fix the issue.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yuwei Guan <Yuwei.Guan@...krlife.com>
>> ---
>> fs/f2fs/segment.c | 17 ++++++++---------
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
>> index 8b0b76550578..b0157bf392fb 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
>> @@ -1379,8 +1379,8 @@ static int __queue_discard_cmd(struct
>> f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>> return 0;
>> }
>> -static unsigned int __issue_discard_cmd_orderly(struct f2fs_sb_info
>> *sbi,
>> - struct discard_policy *dpolicy)
>> +static int __issue_discard_cmd_orderly(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>> + struct discard_policy *dpolicy, int *issued)
>> {
>> struct discard_cmd_control *dcc = SM_I(sbi)->dcc_info;
>> struct discard_cmd *prev_dc = NULL, *next_dc = NULL;
>> @@ -1388,7 +1388,6 @@ static unsigned int
>> __issue_discard_cmd_orderly(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>> struct discard_cmd *dc;
>> struct blk_plug plug;
>> unsigned int pos = dcc->next_pos;
>> - unsigned int issued = 0;
>> bool io_interrupted = false;
>> mutex_lock(&dcc->cmd_lock);
>> @@ -1415,9 +1414,9 @@ static unsigned int
>> __issue_discard_cmd_orderly(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>> }
>> dcc->next_pos = dc->lstart + dc->len;
>> - err = __submit_discard_cmd(sbi, dpolicy, dc, &issued);
>> + err = __submit_discard_cmd(sbi, dpolicy, dc, issued);
>> - if (issued >= dpolicy->max_requests)
>> + if (*issued >= dpolicy->max_requests)
>> break;
>> next:
>> node = rb_next(&dc->rb_node);
>> @@ -1433,10 +1432,10 @@ static unsigned int
>> __issue_discard_cmd_orderly(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>> mutex_unlock(&dcc->cmd_lock);
>> - if (!issued && io_interrupted)
>> - issued = -1;
>> + if (!(*issued) && io_interrupted)
>> + *issued = -1;
>> - return issued;
>> + return *issued;
>
> A little weired that __issue_discard_cmd_orderly() will output the data
> in both return value and @issued parameter.
>
Got it.
> How about changing type of return value __issue_discard_cmd_orderly()
> from unsigned int to void.
>
I will sent a v2 patch for this.
> Thanks,
>
>> }
>> static unsigned int __wait_all_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>> struct discard_policy *dpolicy);
>> @@ -1465,7 +1464,7 @@ static int __issue_discard_cmd(struct
>> f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>> break;
>> if (i + 1 < dcc->max_ordered_discard && dpolicy->ordered)
>> - return __issue_discard_cmd_orderly(sbi, dpolicy);
>> + return __issue_discard_cmd_orderly(sbi, dpolicy, &issued);
>> pend_list = &dcc->pend_list[i];
Powered by blists - more mailing lists