[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221211231435.43c4f361@endymion.delvare>
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2022 23:14:35 +0100
From: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
To: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Sean Young <sean@...s.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: rc: Drop obsolete dependencies on COMPILE_TEST
Hallo Uwe,
On Sun, 11 Dec 2022 21:56:48 +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 05:09:11PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > --- linux-6.0.orig/drivers/media/rc/pwm-ir-tx.c
> > +++ linux-6.0/drivers/media/rc/pwm-ir-tx.c
> > @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ static struct platform_driver pwm_ir_dri
> > .probe = pwm_ir_probe,
> > .driver = {
> > .name = DRIVER_NAME,
> > - .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(pwm_ir_of_match),
> > + .of_match_table = pwm_ir_of_match,
> > },
> > };
> > module_platform_driver(pwm_ir_driver);
>
> That hunk makes sense even without the Kconfig change. ACPI makes use of
> .of_match_table, so
>
> .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(pwm_ir_of_match),
>
> is (almost?) always wrong.
Should we just get rid of this macro altogether then?
(Somehow I have a strange feeling that we already had this
discussion...)
--
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support
Powered by blists - more mailing lists