[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y5ZZy23FFAnQDR3C@ZenIV>
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2022 22:29:31 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To: "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>
Cc: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@...l.ru>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] fs/ufs: Change the signature of ufs_get_page()
On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 10:31:10PM +0100, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> -static struct page *ufs_get_page(struct inode *dir, unsigned long n)
> +static void *ufs_get_page(struct inode *dir, unsigned long n, struct page **page)
> {
> struct address_space *mapping = dir->i_mapping;
> - struct page *page = read_mapping_page(mapping, n, NULL);
> - if (!IS_ERR(page)) {
> - kmap(page);
> - if (unlikely(!PageChecked(page))) {
> - if (!ufs_check_page(page))
> + *page = read_mapping_page(mapping, n, NULL);
> + if (!IS_ERR(*page)) {
> + kmap(*page);
> + if (unlikely(!PageChecked(*page))) {
> + if (!ufs_check_page(*page))
> goto fail;
> }
> }
> return page;
return page_address(page), surely?
>
> fail:
> - ufs_put_page(page);
> + ufs_put_page(*page);
> return ERR_PTR(-EIO);
> }
>
> @@ -227,15 +227,12 @@ ufs_next_entry(struct super_block *sb, struct ufs_dir_entry *p)
>
> struct ufs_dir_entry *ufs_dotdot(struct inode *dir, struct page **p)
> {
> - struct page *page = ufs_get_page(dir, 0);
> - struct ufs_dir_entry *de = NULL;
> + struct ufs_dir_entry *de = ufs_get_page(dir, 0, p);
... considering e.g. this. The caller expects the pointer to beginning of
page, not pointer to struct page itself. Other callers are also like that...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists