linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] arm64: Prohibit instrumentation on arch_stack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20221211123028.3b1aa794a1bcaf7f6dc92ac3@kernel.org>
Date:   Sun, 11 Dec 2022 12:30:28 +0900
From:   Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@...gle.com>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.s.prabhu@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] arm64: Prohibit instrumentation on
 arch_stack_walk()

On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 11:16:34 +0000
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 06, 2022 at 09:41:37AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > On Fri, 2 Dec 2022 13:17:30 +0000
> > Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote:
> > > I had a go at testing this patch, and it fixes the crash with the reproducer
> > > above, but there are plenty of other instances in stacktrace.c that lead to the
> > > same sort of crash, e.g.
> > > 
> > > # echo p stackinfo_get_task >> ${TRACEFS}/kprobe_events
> > > # echo 1 > ${TRACEFS}/events/kprobes/enable
> > 
> > Oops, thanks for pointing! Hmm, I thought stackinfo_get_task() is an
> > inlined function usually. Maybe we should make it nokprobe_inline.
> > But this is just one case. I need to scan all symbols to trace...
> 
> FWIW, due to other instrumentation issues I've started doing a larger noinstr
> cleanup on arm64 which should address this, as fixing this properly involves
> also modifying a bunch of underlying helpers (e.g. preempt_count()).
> 
> I can Cc you when sending that out, if you'd like? That'll probably be in the
> new year.

Thanks Mark, yes, I'm interested in that work.
Until that, I'll finish making a script for testing kprobes widely on
kernel symbols.

Thank you,

> 
> Thanks,
> Mark.


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>