lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 13 Dec 2022 00:35:14 +0200
From:   Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To:     Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>
Cc:     dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, robdclark@...il.com,
        sean@...rly.run, swboyd@...omium.org, dianders@...omium.org,
        vkoul@...nel.org, daniel@...ll.ch, agross@...nel.org,
        andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, airlied@...il.com,
        quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com, quic_sbillaka@...cinc.com,
        freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 2/5] dt-bindings: msm/dp: add data-lanes and
 link-frequencies property

On Mon, 12 Dec 2022 at 19:51, Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 12/8/2022 4:35 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On 09/12/2022 02:22, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
> >>
> >> On 12/8/2022 4:11 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> >>> On 09/12/2022 01:38, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 12/8/2022 3:33 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> >>>>> On 09/12/2022 00:36, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
> >>>>>> Add both data-lanes and link-frequencies property into endpoint
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Changes in v7:
> >>>>>> -- split yaml out of dtsi patch
> >>>>>> -- link-frequencies from link rate to symbol rate
> >>>>>> -- deprecation of old data-lanes property
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Changes in v8:
> >>>>>> -- correct Bjorn mail address to kernel.org
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Changes in v10:
> >>>>>> -- add menu item to data-lanes and link-frequecnis
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Changes in v11:
> >>>>>> -- add endpoint property at port@1
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>`
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Applying: dt-bindings: msm/dp: add data-lanes and link-frequencies
> >>>>> property
> >>>>> .git/rebase-apply/patch:47: trailing whitespace.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> .git/rebase-apply/patch:51: trailing whitespace.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Also the dt_binding_check fails with an error for this schema. And
> >>>>> after fixing the error in the schema I faced an example validation
> >>>>> error. Did you check that the schema is correct and that the
> >>>>> example validates against the schema?
> >>>>
> >>>> yes, but i run "make dt_binding_check
> >>>> DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml"
> >>>> at mu v5.15 branch since
> >>>
> >>> I wouldn't ask you to post the log here. But I don't think that
> >>> either of the errors that I see here is related to 5.15 vs 6.1-rc.
> >>>
> >>> In fact after applying this patch against 5.15 I saw the expected
> >>> failure:
> >>>
> >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml:
> >>> properties:required: ['port@0', 'port@1'] is not of type 'object',
> >>> 'boolean'
> >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml:
> >>> properties: 'required' should not be valid under {'$ref':
> >>> '#/definitions/json-schema-prop-names'}
> >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml:
> >>> ignoring, error in schema: properties: required
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> "make dt_binding_check" does not work at msm-next branch.
> >>>
> >>> I went ahead and just checked.
> >>>
> >>> `make dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=display/msm`  works cleanly
> >>> in msm-next and reports a single example-related warning in
> >>> msm-next-lumag. I pushed a patch to fix that warning (wich can
> >>> hopefully be picked up by Abhinav into msm-fixes). So you can assume
> >>> that both these branches have consistent error-free display/msm
> >>> schemas.
> >>>
> >> I have clean msm-next branch (without my data-lines yaml patch
> >> applied) and run "make dt_binding_check
> >> DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml",
> >> then I saw below error messages.
> >>
> >> Have you run into this problem?
> >
> > No.
>
> Did you do anything to fix "older dtschema instance"?

I did not since I hadn't had such a problem. I can refer again to the
steps I provided you beforehand. The email was sent 6 days ago. No
answer from your side since that time.

> I had run  "pip3 install dtschema --upgrade" and still not work.

Can you please post a full log of this command?

>
> D you know how to fix this problem?
>
> Thanks,
>
> kuogee
>
> sort: -:2: disorder: 2022.1
> ERROR: dtschema minimum version is v2022.3
> make[2]: *** [check_dtschema_version] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [dt_binding_check] Error 2
> make: *** [__sub-make] Error 2

Please add the output of:

which dt-validate
dt-validate -V

And also a full log of your failing kernel build.



> I had run "pip3 install dtschema --upgrade" according Rob Herring response.
> but it still shows same problem.
> Please let know how can I fix this problem.
>
> >
> >>
> >>    HOSTCC  scripts/basic/fixdep
> >>    HOSTCC  scripts/dtc/dtc.o
> >>    HOSTCC  scripts/dtc/flattree.o
> >>    HOSTCC  scripts/dtc/fstree.o
> >>    HOSTCC  scripts/dtc/data.o
> >>    HOSTCC  scripts/dtc/livetree.o
> >>    HOSTCC  scripts/dtc/treesource.o
> >>    HOSTCC  scripts/dtc/srcpos.o
> >>    HOSTCC  scripts/dtc/checks.o
> >>    HOSTCC  scripts/dtc/util.o
> >>    LEX     scripts/dtc/dtc-lexer.lex.c
> >>    HOSTCC  scripts/dtc/dtc-lexer.lex.o
> >>    HOSTCC  scripts/dtc/dtc-parser.tab.o
> >>    HOSTLD  scripts/dtc/dtc
> >> sort: -:2: disorder: 2022.1
> >> ERROR: dtschema minimum version is v2022.3
> >> make[2]: *** [check_dtschema_version] Error 1
> >> make[1]: *** [dt_binding_check] Error 2
> >> make: *** [__sub-make] Error 2
> >
> > This means that somewhere in your path you have an older dtschema
> > instance.
> >
> > When you sent me a question regarding this error, I asked for the
> > additional info. You provided none. Instead you went on sending the
> > untested patch that doesn't work.
>
> since i can not test it on msm-next so that I did test it at my v5-15
> branch.

Wrong.

>
> besides, i think i have to sent the whole series patches include this
> one to address your new comments on other patch.
>
> is this correct?

No. Please fix your system first, validate your patches and send them
afterwards. You can not expect others to do your job.

--
With best wishes
Dmitry

Powered by blists - more mailing lists