[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 10:17:34 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: move QUP and QSPI opp
tables out of SoC node
On 12/12/2022 10:15, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>> +
>>>> + qup_opp_table: opp-table-qup {
>>>> + compatible = "operating-points-v2";
>>>> +
>>>> + opp-75000000 {
>>>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <75000000>;
>>>> + required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
>>>> + };
>>>> +
>>>> + opp-100000000 {
>>>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <100000000>;
>>>> + required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_svs>;
>>>> + };
>>>> +
>>>> + opp-128000000 {
>>>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <128000000>;
>>>> + required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_nom>;
>>>> + };
>>>> + };
>>>> +
>>>> memory@...00000 {
>>> Sidenote: memory@ should be moved above opp-*, alphabetically
>>>
>>> For this:
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
>>
>> You sure? Because before there is already opp for cpu...
> Which are called opp-table-cpuN and not cpuN-opp-table, 'm' comes
> before 'o'.
So you want to have broken order?
opp-table-cpu
memory
opp-table-qup
?
They are at least all together in my patch.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists