linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: move QUP and QSPI opp tables out of SoC node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 12 Dec 2022 10:24:33 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: move QUP and QSPI opp
 tables out of SoC node

On 12/12/2022 10:18, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> 
> 
> On 12.12.2022 10:17, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 12/12/2022 10:15, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +	qup_opp_table: opp-table-qup {
>>>>>> +		compatible = "operating-points-v2";
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +		opp-75000000 {
>>>>>> +			opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <75000000>;
>>>>>> +			required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
>>>>>> +		};
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +		opp-100000000 {
>>>>>> +			opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <100000000>;
>>>>>> +			required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_svs>;
>>>>>> +		};
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +		opp-128000000 {
>>>>>> +			opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <128000000>;
>>>>>> +			required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_nom>;
>>>>>> +		};
>>>>>> +	};
>>>>>> +
>>>>>>  	memory@...00000 {
>>>>> Sidenote: memory@ should be moved above opp-*, alphabetically
>>>>>
>>>>> For this:
>>>>>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
>>>>
>>>> You sure? Because before there is already opp for cpu...
>>> Which are called opp-table-cpuN and not cpuN-opp-table, 'm' comes
>>> before 'o'.
>>
>> So you want to have broken order?
>> opp-table-cpu
>> memory
>> opp-table-qup
>> ?
>>
>> They are at least all together in my patch.
> No, I meant:
> 
> memory
> opp-table-cpu
> opp-table-qup

OK, I'll correct the opp-table-cpu/memory order in separate patch.

Best regards,
Krzysztof