lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 12 Dec 2022 14:01:27 +0100
From:   Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
To:     patrice.chotard@...s.st.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com
Cc:     mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux@...linux.org.uk,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ARM: dts: stm32: Fix qspi pinctrl phandle for
 stm32mp15xx-dhcor-som

On 12/12/22 09:51, patrice.chotard@...s.st.com wrote:
> From: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...s.st.com>
> 
> Chip select pinctrl phandle was missing in several stm32mp15x based boards.
> 
> Fixes: ea99a5a02ebc ("ARM: dts: stm32: Create separate pinmux for qspi cs pin in stm32mp15-pinctrl.dtsi)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...s.st.com>
> Cc: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
> Cc: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>
> Cc: linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com
> To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> ---
>   arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp15xx-dhcor-som.dtsi | 8 ++++++--
>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp15xx-dhcor-som.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp15xx-dhcor-som.dtsi
> index 134a798ad3f2..bb40fb46da81 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp15xx-dhcor-som.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp15xx-dhcor-som.dtsi
> @@ -247,8 +247,12 @@ &pwr_regulators {
>   
>   &qspi {
>   	pinctrl-names = "default", "sleep";
> -	pinctrl-0 = <&qspi_clk_pins_a &qspi_bk1_pins_a>;
> -	pinctrl-1 = <&qspi_clk_sleep_pins_a &qspi_bk1_sleep_pins_a>;
> +	pinctrl-0 = <&qspi_clk_pins_a
> +		     &qspi_bk1_pins_a
> +		     &qspi_cs1_pins_a>;
> +	pinctrl-1 = <&qspi_clk_sleep_pins_a
> +		     &qspi_bk1_sleep_pins_a
> +		     &qspi_cs1_sleep_pins_a>;
>   	reg = <0x58003000 0x1000>, <0x70000000 0x200000>;
>   	#address-cells = <1>;
>   	#size-cells = <0>;


Splitting the pins makes sense indeed.

Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ