[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 14:46:39 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: qcom: rename AOSS QMP node to pmu
On 12/12/2022 14:38, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>
>
> On 12.12.2022 14:33, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> The Always On Subsystem (AOSS) QMP is not a power domain controller
>> since commit 135780456218 ("arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Use QMP property
>> to control load state") and few others. In fact, it was never a power
>> domain controller but rather control of power state of remote
>> processors. This power state control is know handled differently, thus
>> the AOSS QMP nodes do not have power-domain-cells:
>>
>> sc7280-idp.dtb: power-controller@...0000: '#power-domain-cells' is a required property
>> From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml
>>
>> AOSS QMP is an interface to the actuall AOSS subsystem responsible for
>> some of power management functions, thus let's call the nodes as "pmu" -
>> Power Management Unit.
> power-management@ is used on apple and rockchip and pmu is very
> ambiguous (power management or performance measurement unit).
Sure, can be power-management. Samsung uses also pmu, but indeed it is
easy to confuse with PMU counters.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists