lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 12 Dec 2022 14:08:05 -0500
From:   Stephen Boyd <>
To:     Andy Gross <>,
        Bjorn Andersson <>,
        Konrad Dybcio <>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <>,
        Rob Herring <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: qcom: rename AOSS QMP node to pmu

Quoting Krzysztof Kozlowski (2022-12-12 05:33:02)
> The Always On Subsystem (AOSS) QMP is not a power domain controller
> since commit 135780456218 ("arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Use QMP property
> to control load state") and few others.  In fact, it was never a power
> domain controller but rather control of power state of remote
> processors.  This power state control is know handled differently, thus
> the AOSS QMP nodes do not have power-domain-cells:
>   sc7280-idp.dtb: power-controller@...0000: '#power-domain-cells' is a required property
>   From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml
> AOSS QMP is an interface to the actuall AOSS subsystem responsible for
> some of power management functions, thus let's call the nodes as "pmu" -
> Power Management Unit.

Isn't 'pmu' a performance monitoring unit?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists