lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 12 Dec 2022 11:46:59 -1000
From:   'Tejun Heo' <tj@...nel.org>
To:     Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
Cc:     David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Martin Liska <mliska@...e.cz>,
        Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        "cgroups@...r.kernel.org" <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block/blk-iocost (gcc13): cast enum members to int in
 prints

On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 01:14:31PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > If so, my suggestion is just sticking with the old behavior until we switch
> > to --std=g2x and then make one time adjustment at that point.
> 
> So is the enum split OK under these circumstances?

Oh man, it's kinda crazy that the compiler is changing in a way that the
same piece of code can't be compiled the same way across two adjoining
versions of the same compiler. But, yeah, if that's what gcc is gonna do and
splitting enums is the only way to be okay across the compiler versions,
there isn't any other choice we can make.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ