| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20221213174406.GH4862@thinkpad>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 23:14:06 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: andersson@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, bp@...en8.de,
tony.luck@...el.com, quic_saipraka@...cinc.com,
konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, james.morse@....com,
mchehab@...nel.org, rric@...nel.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
quic_ppareek@...cinc.com, luca.weiss@...rphone.com,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/13] qcom: llcc/edac: Fix the base address used for
accessing LLCC banks
On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 05:37:37PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 12/12/2022 13:33, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > The Qualcomm LLCC/EDAC drivers were using a fixed register stride for
> > accessing the (Control and Status Registers) CSRs of each LLCC bank.
> > This stride only works for some SoCs like SDM845 for which driver
> > support was initially added.
> >
> > But the later SoCs use different register stride that vary between the
> > banks with holes in-between. So it is not possible to use a single register
> > stride for accessing the CSRs of each bank. By doing so could result in a
> > crash.
> >
> > For fixing this issue, let's obtain the base address of each LLCC bank from
> > devicetree and get rid of the fixed stride. This also means, we no longer
> > need to rely on reg-names property and get the base addresses using index.
> >
> > First index is LLCC bank 0 and last index is LLCC broadcast. If the SoC
> > supports more than one bank, then those needs to be defined in devicetree
> > for index from 1..N-1.
> >
> > Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 4.20
> > Fixes: a3134fb09e0b ("drivers: soc: Add LLCC driver")
> > Fixes: 27450653f1db ("drivers: edac: Add EDAC driver support for QCOM SoCs")
>
> Your previous patches in the series had incorrect CC-stable/Fixes tags,
> thus I have doubts also here.
>
Sorry I do not agree with you. I wanted to backport binding, dts and driver
patches to possible LTS kernels together and that's why I tagged stable list.
Either all goes to stable or none. If your question is more towards what if one
goes before the other, then in that case I may need to specify the dependency
of commits but that will look messy. I took the gamble because, the driver is
already broken in stable kernels.
> Can you confirm, that this patch alone (alone! Without DTS patches) when
> backported to v4.20, still works perfectly fine for sdm845?
>
It won't and that's why I also tagged dts patches for backporting.
> > Reported-by: Parikshit Pareek <quic_ppareek@...cinc.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/edac/qcom_edac.c | 14 +++---
> > drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++-------------
> > include/linux/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.h | 6 +--
> > 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/edac/qcom_edac.c b/drivers/edac/qcom_edac.c
> > index 97a27e42dd61..5be93577fc03 100644
> > --- a/drivers/edac/qcom_edac.c
> > +++ b/drivers/edac/qcom_edac.c
> > @@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ dump_syn_reg_values(struct llcc_drv_data *drv, u32 bank, int err_type)
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < reg_data.reg_cnt; i++) {
> > synd_reg = reg_data.synd_reg + (i * 4);
> > - ret = regmap_read(drv->regmap, drv->offsets[bank] + synd_reg,
> > + ret = regmap_read(drv->regmaps[bank], synd_reg,
> > &synd_val);
> > if (ret)
> > goto clear;
> > @@ -222,8 +222,7 @@ dump_syn_reg_values(struct llcc_drv_data *drv, u32 bank, int err_type)
> > reg_data.name, i, synd_val);
> > }
> >
> > - ret = regmap_read(drv->regmap,
> > - drv->offsets[bank] + reg_data.count_status_reg,
> > + ret = regmap_read(drv->regmaps[bank], reg_data.count_status_reg,
> > &err_cnt);
> > if (ret)
> > goto clear;
> > @@ -233,8 +232,7 @@ dump_syn_reg_values(struct llcc_drv_data *drv, u32 bank, int err_type)
> > edac_printk(KERN_CRIT, EDAC_LLCC, "%s: Error count: 0x%4x\n",
> > reg_data.name, err_cnt);
> >
> > - ret = regmap_read(drv->regmap,
> > - drv->offsets[bank] + reg_data.ways_status_reg,
> > + ret = regmap_read(drv->regmaps[bank], reg_data.ways_status_reg,
> > &err_ways);
> > if (ret)
> > goto clear;
> > @@ -296,8 +294,7 @@ llcc_ecc_irq_handler(int irq, void *edev_ctl)
> >
> > /* Iterate over the banks and look for Tag RAM or Data RAM errors */
> > for (i = 0; i < drv->num_banks; i++) {
> > - ret = regmap_read(drv->regmap,
> > - drv->offsets[i] + DRP_INTERRUPT_STATUS,
> > + ret = regmap_read(drv->regmaps[i], DRP_INTERRUPT_STATUS,
> > &drp_error);
> >
> > if (!ret && (drp_error & SB_ECC_ERROR)) {
> > @@ -312,8 +309,7 @@ llcc_ecc_irq_handler(int irq, void *edev_ctl)
> > if (!ret)
> > irq_rc = IRQ_HANDLED;
> >
> > - ret = regmap_read(drv->regmap,
> > - drv->offsets[i] + TRP_INTERRUPT_0_STATUS,
> > + ret = regmap_read(drv->regmaps[i], TRP_INTERRUPT_0_STATUS,
> > &trp_error);
> >
> > if (!ret && (trp_error & SB_ECC_ERROR)) {
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c
> > index 23ce2f78c4ed..a29f22dad7fa 100644
> > --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c
> > @@ -62,8 +62,6 @@
> > #define LLCC_TRP_WRSC_CACHEABLE_EN 0x21f2c
> > #define LLCC_TRP_ALGO_CFG8 0x21f30
> >
> > -#define BANK_OFFSET_STRIDE 0x80000
> > -
> > #define LLCC_VERSION_2_0_0_0 0x02000000
> > #define LLCC_VERSION_2_1_0_0 0x02010000
> > #define LLCC_VERSION_4_1_0_0 0x04010000
> > @@ -898,8 +896,8 @@ static int qcom_llcc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -static struct regmap *qcom_llcc_init_mmio(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > - const char *name)
> > +static struct regmap *qcom_llcc_init_mmio(struct platform_device *pdev, u8 index,
> > + const char *name)
> > {
> > void __iomem *base;
> > struct regmap_config llcc_regmap_config = {
> > @@ -909,7 +907,7 @@ static struct regmap *qcom_llcc_init_mmio(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > .fast_io = true,
> > };
> >
> > - base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, name);
> > + base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, index);
> > if (IS_ERR(base))
> > return ERR_CAST(base);
> >
> > @@ -927,6 +925,7 @@ static int qcom_llcc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > const struct llcc_slice_config *llcc_cfg;
> > u32 sz;
> > u32 version;
> > + struct regmap *regmap;
> >
> > drv_data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*drv_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (!drv_data) {
> > @@ -934,21 +933,51 @@ static int qcom_llcc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > goto err;
> > }
> >
> > - drv_data->regmap = qcom_llcc_init_mmio(pdev, "llcc_base");
> > - if (IS_ERR(drv_data->regmap)) {
> > - ret = PTR_ERR(drv_data->regmap);
> > + /* Initialize the first LLCC bank regmap */
> > + regmap = qcom_llcc_init_mmio(pdev, i, "llcc0_base");
>
> What is the value of "i" here? Looks like not initialized in my next.
>
Yes, this was a mistake and been reported by kernel bot. It will be fixed in
next version.
> > + if (IS_ERR(regmap)) {
> > + ret = PTR_ERR(regmap);
> > goto err;
> > }
> >
> > - drv_data->bcast_regmap =
> > - qcom_llcc_init_mmio(pdev, "llcc_broadcast_base");
> > + cfg = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> > +
> > + ret = regmap_read(regmap, cfg->reg_offset[LLCC_COMMON_STATUS0], &num_banks);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto err;
> > +
> > + num_banks &= LLCC_LB_CNT_MASK;
> > + num_banks >>= LLCC_LB_CNT_SHIFT;
> > + drv_data->num_banks = num_banks;
> > +
> > + drv_data->regmaps = devm_kcalloc(dev, num_banks, sizeof(*drv_data->regmaps), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!drv_data->regmaps) {
> > + ret = -ENOMEM;
> > + goto err;
> > + }
> > +
> > + drv_data->regmaps[0] = regmap;
> > +
> > + /* Initialize rest of LLCC bank regmaps */
> > + for (i = 1; i < num_banks; i++) {
> > + char *base = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "llcc%d_base", i);
> > +
> > + drv_data->regmaps[i] = qcom_llcc_init_mmio(pdev, i, base);
> > + if (IS_ERR(drv_data->regmaps[i])) {
> > + ret = PTR_ERR(drv_data->regmaps[i]);
> > + kfree(base);
> > + goto err;
>
> This looks like the ABI break so:
> 1. Existing users are broken,
I fixed the dts for all affected SoCs, then who are all other existing users?
> 2. It cannot be backported.
>
This is a bug fix and clearly needs to be backported along with the dts
changes. For this purpose only I have tagged both dts and driver patches for
backporting. Am I missing anything here?
Thanks,
Mani
>
> > + }
> > +
> > + kfree(base);
> > + }
> > +
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
Powered by blists - more mailing lists