lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 13 Dec 2022 20:22:30 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, quic_sbillaka@...cinc.com,
        freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
        airlied@...il.com, andersson@...nel.org,
        konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org, robdclark@...il.com,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, dianders@...omium.org,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, vkoul@...nel.org, agross@...nel.org,
        daniel@...ll.ch, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        swboyd@...omium.org, sean@...rly.run, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH v11 2/5] dt-bindings: msm/dp: add data-lanes
 and link-frequencies property

On 13/12/2022 18:31, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
> 
> 
> On 12/13/2022 5:13 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 13/12/2022 00:41, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> besides, i think i have to sent the whole series patches include this
>>>>> one to address your new comments on other patch.
>>>>>
>>>>> is this correct?
>>>>
>>>> No. Please fix your system first, validate your patches and send them
>>>> afterwards. You can not expect others to do your job.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Just finished working with kuogee on this. This issue had been reported
>>> by few others earlier (example
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/bc9be279-a130-d5e7-4397-bbb389d14403@intel.com/T/).
>>
>> This report says:
>> "Sorry for the inconvenience, please ignore this false positive."
>>
> 
> That was one of them, and I dont think its false, maybe because after 
> fixing the PATH issues, the user deemed them as false.
> 
> Here is another one 
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20210812174209.1970-3-bbudiredla@marvell.com/ 
> with the same report but no resolution.

Thanks. Could be also Python mismatch. `make dt_binding_check` could use
dtschema from Python2 but the reporter used Python3 for checking the
version: `pip3 show dtschema`

> 
> So i thought for the benefit of others I would atleast summarize how we 
> resolved them.

Sure, that's helpful.


Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ