linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 11/14] KVM: selftests: Disable "gnu-variable-sized-type-not-at-end" warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y5ffxebJ/eRzEXh+@google.com>
Date:   Tue, 13 Dec 2022 02:13:25 +0000
From:   Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To:     Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
        Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
        kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        llvm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@...gle.com>,
        Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@...gle.com>,
        Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/14] KVM: selftests: Disable
 "gnu-variable-sized-type-not-at-end" warning

On Mon, Dec 12, 2022, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
> > index 2487db21b177..9cff99a1cb2e 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
> > @@ -196,6 +196,7 @@ else
> >  LINUX_TOOL_ARCH_INCLUDE = $(top_srcdir)/tools/arch/$(ARCH)/include
> >  endif
> >  CFLAGS += -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wuninitialized -O2 -g -std=gnu99 \
> > +       -Wno-gnu-variable-sized-type-not-at-end \
> 
> This is a clang-specific warning. This will need to be wrapped in a
> cc-option check.

Not that I'm against guarding this code, but I don't think cc-option() will do
anything in this case.

AFAICT, gcc stopped treating unknown "-Wno" flags as unconditional errors starting
with gcc-4.4, and the kernel's min supported version is 5.1.  gcc-4.4 through
gcc-9.5 all print a mild warning if there's a different error, but otherwise
silently ignore the uknown "-Wno".

  cc1: warning: unrecognized command line option '-Wno-gnu-variable-sized-type-not-at-end'

gcc-10.1 is even friendlier and notes that the unknown flag may have been related
to the error.

  cc1: note: unrecognized command-line option '-Wno-gnu-variable-sized-type-not-at-end'
  may have been intended to silence earlier diagnostics

Because cc-option() doesn't have errors in its probing code, it will return "true"
on gcc for literally any "-Wno-*" input that gcc deems syntacially valid, e.g.
gcc barfs on

  depends on $(cc-option,-Wno-)
  depends on $(cc-option,-Wno)

but happily succeeds with

  depends on $(cc-option,-Wno-lol-gcc)

Various man pages suggest -Wunknown-warnings is a thing, but no gcc version
supported by godbolt recognizes it.

So unless I'm missing something, trying to detect lack of support will be non-trivial,
and the worst case scenario is that users of older gcc version will see a potentially
confusing warning when the build fails.