linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] dt-bindings: mfd: x-powers,axp152: Document the AXP1530 variant

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1e0d86ee-a832-642d-c835-df1f6505940e@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 13 Dec 2022 20:37:48 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Martin Botka <martin.botka@...ainline.org>, martin.botka1@...il.com
Cc:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>,
        Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
        Jami Kettunen <jamipkettunen@...ainline.org>,
        Paul Bouchara <paul.bouchara@...ainline.org>,
        Jan Trmal <jtrmal@...il.com>, Tom <takuya@...uya.tech>,
        Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] dt-bindings: mfd: x-powers,axp152: Document the
 AXP1530 variant

On 13/12/2022 19:27, Martin Botka wrote:
> AXP1530 is a PMIC used on board BIQU CB1 SoM
> 
> Signed-off-by: Martin Botka <martin.botka@...ainline.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/x-powers,axp152.yaml | 1 +

This is a friendly reminder during the review process.

It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.

If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
versions. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the
tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for acks received on the
version they apply.

https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.17/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L540

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.

Best regards,
Krzysztof