[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221213213747.GA209007@bhelgaas>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 15:37:47 -0600
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] PCI/portdrv: Allow AER service only for Root Ports &
RCECs
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 12:46:11AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 06:29:22PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > + if ((pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT ||
> > + pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_EC) &&
> > + dev->aer_cap && pci_aer_available() &&
> > (pcie_ports_native || host->native_aer))
>
> Eww, this is really hard to follow. Can you split this out into
> a little helper, that actually documents the decisions based
> on some of the wording you have in the current comit message?
I completely agree. We have basically the same sort of thing for
PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_HP (also added this cycle), PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_AER,
PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_PME, and PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_DPC. I'd really like to
figure out a way to centralize the check for pcie_ports_native,
host->native_aer, etc., because they clutter a lot of places.
I didn't have time to work on that this cycle, but maybe next time.
Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists