[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f29935e3-e3b6-2d4e-7fc1-267e1ef0925b@igalia.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 20:51:07 -0300
From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 06/11] tracing: Improve panic/die notifiers
On 20/10/2022 18:29, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 19:17:26 -0300
> "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com> wrote:
>
>> Currently the tracing dump_on_oops feature is implemented through
>> separate notifiers, one for die/oops and the other for panic;
>> given they have the same functionality, let's unify them.
>>
>> Also improve the function comment and change the priority of the
>> notifier to make it execute earlier, avoiding showing useless trace
>> data (like the callback names for the other notifiers); finally,
>> we also removed an unnecessary header inclusion.
>>
>> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
>> Cc: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...il.com>
>> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@...lia.com>
>
> Sorry for the late reply.
>
> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
>
> -- Steve
Hi Steve, since you were so kind in the other patch...decided to ping in
this one as well heheh
So, do you think it's possible to pick it for 6.2? No dependency here,
it's a standalone patch.
Thanks again and sorry for the annoyance!
Cheers,
Guilherme
Powered by blists - more mailing lists