linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/5] media: mediatek: vcodec: move lat

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a48dec82-5944-ff3d-8e0d-dc0b58139c83@collabora.com>
Date:   Tue, 13 Dec 2022 10:23:21 +0100
From:   AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To:     Yunfei Dong <yunfei.dong@...iatek.com>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>,
        Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas@...fresne.ca>,
        Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
        Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...labora.com>,
        Tiffany Lin <tiffany.lin@...iatek.com>
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>,
        Fritz Koenig <frkoenig@...omium.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Steve Cho <stevecho@...omium.org>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] media: mediatek: vcodec: move lat_buf to the top of
 core list

Il 10/12/22 08:32, Yunfei Dong ha scritto:
> Current instance will decode done when begin to wait lat buf full,
> move the lat_buf of current instance to the top of core list to make
> sure current instance's lat_buf will be used firstly.
> 
> Fixes: 365e4ba01df4 ("media: mtk-vcodec: Add work queue for core hardware decode")
> Signed-off-by: Yunfei Dong <yunfei.dong@...iatek.com>
> ---
>   .../platform/mediatek/vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.c    | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>   .../platform/mediatek/vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.h    |  2 ++
>   2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.c b/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.c
> index 2b88065d4d2a..6275536d5063 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/vdec_msg_queue.c
> @@ -182,9 +182,24 @@ void vdec_msg_queue_update_ube_wptr(struct vdec_msg_queue *msg_queue, uint64_t u
>   
>   bool vdec_msg_queue_wait_lat_buf_full(struct vdec_msg_queue *msg_queue)
>   {
> +	struct vdec_lat_buf *buf, *tmp;
> +	struct vdec_msg_queue_ctx *core_ctx;
>   	long timeout_jiff;
>   	int ret;
>   
> +	core_ctx = &msg_queue->ctx->dev->msg_queue_core_ctx;
> +	spin_lock(&core_ctx->ready_lock);
> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(buf, tmp, &core_ctx->ready_queue, core_list) {
> +		if (buf && buf->ctx == msg_queue->ctx) {
> +			spin_lock(&msg_queue->lat_ctx.ready_lock);
> +			list_move(&buf->core_list, &core_ctx->ready_queue);
> +			spin_unlock(&msg_queue->lat_ctx.ready_lock);
> +			queue_work(buf->ctx->dev->core_workqueue,
> +				   &buf->ctx->msg_queue.core_work);
> +		}
> +	}
> +	spin_unlock(&core_ctx->ready_lock);
> +
>   	timeout_jiff = msecs_to_jiffies(1000 * (NUM_BUFFER_COUNT + 2));
>   	ret = wait_event_timeout(msg_queue->lat_ctx.ready_to_use,
>   				 msg_queue->lat_ctx.ready_num == NUM_BUFFER_COUNT,
> @@ -268,6 +283,7 @@ int vdec_msg_queue_init(struct vdec_msg_queue *msg_queue,
>   	vdec_msg_queue_init_ctx(&msg_queue->lat_ctx, MTK_VDEC_LAT0);
>   	INIT_WORK(&msg_queue->core_work, vdec_msg_queue_core_work);
>   
> +	msg_queue->ctx = ctx;

I'd move that at the beginning of this function, even before calling
vdec_msg_queue_init_ctx(), as this assignment is not at all expensive.

In any case,

Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>