lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 13 Dec 2022 17:24:46 +0800
From:   Yuwei Guan <ssawgyw@...il.com>
To:     Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
Cc:     jaegeuk@...nel.org, chao@...nel.org,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Yuwei.Guan@...krlife.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] f2fs: continuous counting for 'issued' in __issue_discard_cmd_orderly()

Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com> 于2022年12月11日周日 21:20写道:
>
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 08:18:52PM +0800, Yuwei Guan wrote:
> > As the 'dcc->discard_granularity' and 'dcc->max_ordered_discard' can be set
> > at the user space, and if the 'dcc->max_ordered_discard' is set larger than
> > 'dcc->discard_granularity' in DPOLICY_BG mode, or it's a volume device,
> > discard_granularity can be tuned to 1 in f2fs_tuning_parameters(),
> > it will may send more requests than the number of 'dpolicy->max_requests'
> > in issue_discard_thread().
> >
>
> You don't know how to stop sentences (aka "abusing" comma), so I read
> above as uber-long sentence. Care to reword? There are many cases when I
> have to reply with such rewording, but this time I choose not to do
> because I'm lazy at the time I write this reply.
>
Hi Bagas,
Thanks for your review.
Sorry for submitting a poorly described patch,
I will update a v3 patch to rewrite the issue description and solution.
> > This patch will fix the issue.
>
> Fix by what? I don't understand the code.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yuwei Guan <Yuwei.Guan@...krlife.com>
>
> You send from your Gmail address but have SoB from either personal email
> domain or is this a random company? If it is the latter, please talk
> with your company to fix the mail system so that you can send from its
> domain (and receive traffic from mailing lists). In any case, your email
> address in From header and SoB must match.
>
The email system has been fixed,
and the email addresses will match in the future.
> Thanks.
>
> --
> An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ