linux-kernel - Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] linux/minmax.h: add non-atomic version of xchg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 13 Dec 2022 10:35:46 +0100
From:   "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To:     "Andrzej Hajda" <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc:     "Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
        "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] linux/minmax.h: add non-atomic version of xchg

On Tue, Dec 13, 2022, at 10:28, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> On 09.12.2022 18:16, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> name for the backing of arch_xchg() or arch_xchg_relaxed(),
>> maybe we can instead rename those to __arch_xchg() and use the
>> __xchg() name for the new non-atomic version?
>
> I will try, but even compile test will be some challenge, need to find 
> cross-compilers for these archs.

I maintain this set of cross compilers, let me know if you
have problems running them:

https://mirrors.edge.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/

    Arnd