[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y5fGjKPefweBQg+H@monkey>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 16:25:48 -0800
From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
To: James Houghton <jthoughton@...gle.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>,
Zach O'Keefe <zokeefe@...gle.com>,
Manish Mishra <manish.mishra@...anix.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@....com>,
"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 09/47] hugetlb: make huge_pte_lockptr take an
explicit shift argument.
On 10/21/22 16:36, James Houghton wrote:
> This is needed to handle PTL locking with high-granularity mapping. We
> won't always be using the PMD-level PTL even if we're using the 2M
> hugepage hstate. It's possible that we're dealing with 4K PTEs, in which
> case, we need to lock the PTL for the 4K PTE.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Houghton <jthoughton@...gle.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c | 3 ++-
> include/linux/hugetlb.h | 9 ++++-----
> mm/hugetlb.c | 7 ++++---
> mm/migrate.c | 3 ++-
> 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Straight forward substitution,
Acked-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
--
Mike Kravetz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists