[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <869cfa5a-2cfa-e5b7-b8f5-a79b9b364b25@collabora.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 11:45:32 +0100
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To: Trevor Wu <trevor.wu@...iatek.com>, broonie@...nel.org,
lgirdwood@...il.com, tiwai@...e.com, perex@...ex.cz,
robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
matthias.bgg@...il.com, p.zabel@...gutronix.de
Cc: Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/12] ASoC: mediatek: mt8188: support etdm in platform
driver
Il 08/12/22 04:31, Trevor Wu ha scritto:
> Add mt8188 etdm dai driver support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Trevor Wu <trevor.wu@...iatek.com>
> ---
> I don't add Reviewed-by tag because one new header file is included
> in the patch to resolve compiling issue found by kernel test robot.
> Additionally, I re-layout the code for better understanding of the
> follow-up patch.
> ---
> sound/soc/mediatek/mt8188/mt8188-dai-etdm.c | 2591 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 2591 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8188/mt8188-dai-etdm.c
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8188/mt8188-dai-etdm.c b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8188/mt8188-dai-etdm.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..c653fa5e3f85
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8188/mt8188-dai-etdm.c
..snip..
> +
> +static void mt8188_dai_etdm_parse_of(struct mtk_base_afe *afe)
> +{
> + const struct device_node *of_node = afe->dev->of_node;
> + struct mt8188_afe_private *afe_priv = afe->platform_priv;
> + struct mtk_dai_etdm_priv *etdm_data;
> + int i, j;
> + char prop[48];
> + u8 disable_chn[MT8188_ETDM_MAX_CHANNELS];
> + int max_chn = MT8188_ETDM_MAX_CHANNELS;
> + u32 sel;
> + int ret;
> + int dai_id;
> + unsigned int sync_id;
> + struct {
> + const char *name;
> + const unsigned int sync_id;
> + } of_afe_etdms[MT8188_AFE_IO_ETDM_NUM] = {
> + {"etdm-in1", ETDM_SYNC_FROM_IN1},
> + {"etdm-in2", ETDM_SYNC_FROM_IN2},
> + {"etdm-out1", ETDM_SYNC_FROM_OUT1},
> + {"etdm-out2", ETDM_SYNC_FROM_OUT2},
> + {"etdm-out3", ETDM_SYNC_FROM_OUT3},
> + };
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < MT8188_AFE_IO_ETDM_NUM; i++) {
> + dai_id = ETDM_TO_DAI_ID(i);
> + etdm_data = afe_priv->dai_priv[dai_id];
> +
> + ret = snprintf(prop, sizeof(prop),
> + "mediatek,%s-mclk-always-on-rate",
> + of_afe_etdms[i].name);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_info(afe->dev, "%s snprintf err=%d\n",
Is this property optional? If yes, this dev_info() must be a dev_dbg(),
otherwise, this must be a dev_err().
Please fix all prints to use the right message level.
> + __func__, ret);
> + return;
Also, is it possible to specify this property only on selected eTDMs?
As it is right now, if anyone wants to specify this only on, for example,
etdm-out1 and out2, that won't work.
In that case, you should replace that return with a `continue`.
P.S.: I'm raising this question because you're not forcing "all or nothing"
in commit [10/12] where you introduce the bindings for this driver,
so I suppose that returning (hence stopping to parse) is a mistake.
> + }
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(of_node, prop, &sel);
> + if (ret == 0) {
> + etdm_data->mclk_dir = SND_SOC_CLOCK_OUT;
> + if (mtk_dai_etdm_cal_mclk(afe, sel, dai_id))
> + dev_info(afe->dev, "%s unsupported mclk %uHz\n",
> + __func__, sel);
> + }
> +
Regards,
Angelo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists