[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y5hqMFw0xl6lmJYL@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 13:04:00 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Jishnu Prakash <quic_jprakash@...cinc.com>
Cc: agross@...nel.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, quic_kamalw@...cinc.com,
quic_jestar@...cinc.com, sboyd@...nel.org,
quic_subbaram@...cinc.com, quic_collinsd@...cinc.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm-owner@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spmi: Add check for remove callback in spmi_drv_remove
API
On Sun, Dec 04, 2022 at 02:53:00PM +0530, Jishnu Prakash wrote:
> Add a check for remove callback presence before calling it for a
> spmi driver, to avoid NULL pointer dereference error if remove callback
> has not been specified for that SPMI driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jishnu Prakash <quic_jprakash@...cinc.com>
> ---
> drivers/spmi/spmi.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spmi/spmi.c b/drivers/spmi/spmi.c
> index a456ce5..6b34356 100644
> --- a/drivers/spmi/spmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/spmi/spmi.c
> @@ -350,7 +350,8 @@ static void spmi_drv_remove(struct device *dev)
> const struct spmi_driver *sdrv = to_spmi_driver(dev->driver);
>
> pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
> - sdrv->remove(to_spmi_device(dev));
> + if (sdrv->remove)
> + sdrv->remove(to_spmi_device(dev));
> pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev);
>
> pm_runtime_disable(dev);
What in-kernel spmi driver does not have a remove function set that
requires this change?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists