lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <91663103-b675-5b68-1cc7-21bce4579b9e@quicinc.com>
Date:   Tue, 13 Dec 2022 20:15:58 +0530
From:   Shazad Hussain <quic_shazhuss@...cinc.com>
To:     Brian Masney <bmasney@...hat.com>,
        Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
CC:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, <andersson@...nel.org>,
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <ahalaney@...hat.com>,
        <echanude@...hat.com>, <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: add missing spi nodes



On 12/13/2022 8:06 PM, Brian Masney wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 02:08:47PM +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> On 12/13/22 14:02, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 13/12/2022 13:27, Brian Masney wrote:
>>> qcom,spi-video-codec is still not specific enough. You need to describe
>>> real device behind spidev. To be clear - you do not describe userspace,
>>> but the device.
>>>
>>
>> Agree.
>>
>> I believe Brian just used "qcom,spi-video-codec" as an example but is only
>> a make up name to illustrate the concept. QC needs to determine what would
>> be the correct <vendor,device> tuple for the IP block that the user-space
>> driver will drive.
> 
> Yes, that was just an example.
> 
> Shazad: Is this thread clear about what QC needs for spidev? I'll let QC
> take care of sending patch(es) to add the various compatibles since I'm
> not sure what hardware will be backed by spidev.
> 

I think for qup2_spi22 we can use qcom,spi-msm-codec-slave as 
compatible. As this is what used in downstream.

> I'll take care of making sure that sc8280xp.dtsi gets the spi controller
> nodes added.

Yes, for qup1_spi9 we can add it later when needed. This is for 
display/touch 2nd.

Shazad

> 
> Brian
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ