linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/67] 5.4.227-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 13 Dec 2022 16:07:23 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
        Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/67] 5.4.227-rc1 review

On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 02:50:21PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Dec 2022 at 18:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.227 release.
> > There are 67 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 14 Dec 2022 13:08:57 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.227-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> 
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
> 
> Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
> 
> NOTE:
> Following build warning found,
> 
> mm/hugetlb.c: In function 'follow_huge_pmd_pte':
> mm/hugetlb.c:5191:1: warning: label 'out' defined but not used [-Wunused-label]
>  5191 | out:
>       | ^~~
> 
> details of commit causing this build warning.
>    mm/hugetlb: fix races when looking up a CONT-PTE/PMD size hugetlb page
>    commit fac35ba763ed07ba93154c95ffc0c4a55023707f upstream.

Thanks, I'll go drop that commit now.

greg k-h