linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/106] 5.10.159-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 13 Dec 2022 15:31:35 +0000
From:   Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net,
        rwarsow@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/106] 5.10.159-rc1 review

On Tue, 13 Dec 2022 at 12:06, Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
<sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 02:09:03PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.159 release.
> > There are 106 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 14 Dec 2022 13:08:57 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20221127):
> mips: 63 configs -> no failure
> arm: 104 configs -> no failure
> arm64: 3 configs -> no failure
> x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
> alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
> powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
> riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
> s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
> xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure
>
> Boot test:
> x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
> x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
>
> arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model).
> Regression noticed:
> Failed to start Network Manager
>
> Will try a bisect and find which commit caused it.

Bisect pointed to 60aefe77fb48 ("net: broadcom: Add
PTP_1588_CLOCK_OPTIONAL dependency for BCMGENET under ARCH_BCM2835")


-- 
Regards
Sudip