[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221213154437.15480-3-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 10:44:32 -0500
From: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>
To: linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: jjherne@...ux.ibm.com, freude@...ux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@...ibm.com, cohuck@...hat.com, mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com,
pasic@...ux.ibm.com, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
kwankhede@...dia.com, fiuczy@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH 2/7] s390/vfio_ap: check TAPQ response code when waiting for queue reset
The vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue() function does not check the status
response code returned form the PQAP(TAPQ) function when verifying the
queue's status; consequently, there is no way of knowing whether
verification failed because the wait time was exceeded, or because the
PQAP(TAPQ) failed.
This patch adds a function to check the status response code from the
PQAP(TAPQ) instruction and logs an appropriate message if it fails.
Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>
---
drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
index 83ff94a38102..a5530a46cf31 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
@@ -1587,23 +1587,49 @@ static struct vfio_ap_queue *vfio_ap_find_queue(int apqn)
return q;
}
+static int apq_status_check(int apqn, struct ap_queue_status *status)
+{
+ switch (status->response_code) {
+ case AP_RESPONSE_NORMAL:
+ case AP_RESPONSE_RESET_IN_PROGRESS:
+ if (status->queue_empty && !status->irq_enabled)
+ return 0;
+ return -EBUSY;
+ case AP_RESPONSE_DECONFIGURED:
+ /*
+ * If the AP queue is deconfigured, any subsequent AP command
+ * targeting the queue will fail with the same response code. On the
+ * other hand, when an AP adapter is deconfigured, the associated
+ * queues are reset, so let's return a value indicating the reset
+ * for which we're waiting completed successfully.
+ */
+ return 0;
+ default:
+ WARN(true,
+ "failed to verify reset of queue %02x.%04x: TAPQ rc=%u\n",
+ AP_QID_CARD(apqn), AP_QID_QUEUE(apqn),
+ status->response_code);
+ return -EIO;
+ }
+}
+
static int apq_reset_check(struct vfio_ap_queue *q)
{
- int iters = 2;
+ int iters = 2, ret;
struct ap_queue_status status;
while (iters--) {
msleep(20);
status = ap_tapq(q->apqn, NULL);
- if (status.queue_empty && !status.irq_enabled)
- return 0;
+ ret = apq_status_check(q->apqn, &status);
+ if (ret != -EBUSY)
+ return ret;
}
WARN_ONCE(iters <= 0,
"timeout verifying reset of queue %02x.%04x (%u, %u, %u)",
AP_QID_CARD(q->apqn), AP_QID_QUEUE(q->apqn),
status.queue_empty, status.irq_enabled, status.response_code);
-
- return -EBUSY;
+ return ret;
}
static int vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue(struct vfio_ap_queue *q,
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists