linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 05/13] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Fix the base addresses of LLCC banks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 13 Dec 2022 17:30:41 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
        andersson@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, bp@...en8.de,
        tony.luck@...el.com
Cc:     quic_saipraka@...cinc.com, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        james.morse@....com, mchehab@...nel.org, rric@...nel.org,
        linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, quic_ppareek@...cinc.com,
        luca.weiss@...rphone.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/13] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Fix the base addresses
 of LLCC banks

On 12/12/2022 13:33, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> The LLCC block has several banks each with a different base address
> and holes in between. So it is not a correct approach to cover these
> banks with a single offset/size. Instead, the individual bank's base
> address needs to be specified in devicetree with the exact size.
> 
> While at it, let's also fix the size of the llcc_broadcast_base to cover
> the whole region.
> 
> Also, let's get rid of reg-names property as it is not needed anymore.
> The driver is expected to parse the reg field based on index to get the
> addresses of each LLCC banks.
> 
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 5.13
> Fixes: 0392968dbe09 ("arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add device tree node for LLCC")
> Reported-by: Parikshit Pareek <quic_ppareek@...cinc.com>

Same comments here and in all further patches.

Best regards,
Krzysztof