lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 12 Dec 2022 17:37:10 -0800
From:   Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
To:     Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
Cc:     Yangtao Li <frank.li@...o.com>,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: do some cleanup for f2fs module init

On 12/13, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2022/12/13 6:53, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 12/11, Chao Yu wrote:
> > > On 2022/11/25 19:47, Yangtao Li wrote:
> > > > Just for cleanup, no functional changes.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@...o.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >    fs/f2fs/compress.c | 46 ++++++----------------------------------------
> > > >    fs/f2fs/data.c     | 14 ++++----------
> > > >    fs/f2fs/gc.c       |  4 +---
> > > >    fs/f2fs/recovery.c |  4 +---
> > > >    fs/f2fs/super.c    |  8 ++------
> > > >    5 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/compress.c b/fs/f2fs/compress.c
> > > > index d315c2de136f..f920ba8e0e85 100644
> > > > --- a/fs/f2fs/compress.c
> > > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/compress.c
> > > > @@ -567,10 +567,7 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(num_compress_pages,
> > > >    int f2fs_init_compress_mempool(void)
> > > >    {
> > > >    	compress_page_pool = mempool_create_page_pool(num_compress_pages, 0);
> > > > -	if (!compress_page_pool)
> > > > -		return -ENOMEM;
> > > > -
> > > > -	return 0;
> > > > +	return compress_page_pool ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
> > > 
> > > I don't think this needs cleanup, other part looks good to me.
> > 
> > What is the point here comparing to the below? fyi; I picked this change.
> 
> IIUC, the question is for Yangtao? :P

Heh, to you. :) I think either looks fine. Hence, I'm fine with this patch.

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > 
> > > >    }
> > > >    void f2fs_destroy_compress_mempool(void)
> > > > @@ -1983,9 +1980,7 @@ int f2fs_init_page_array_cache(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> > > >    	sbi->page_array_slab = f2fs_kmem_cache_create(slab_name,
> > > >    					sbi->page_array_slab_size);
> > > > -	if (!sbi->page_array_slab)
> > > > -		return -ENOMEM;
> > > > -	return 0;
> > > > +	return sbi->page_array_slab ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
> > > >    }
> > > >    void f2fs_destroy_page_array_cache(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> > > > @@ -1993,53 +1988,24 @@ void f2fs_destroy_page_array_cache(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> > > >    	kmem_cache_destroy(sbi->page_array_slab);
> > > >    }
> > > > -static int __init f2fs_init_cic_cache(void)
> > > > +int __init f2fs_init_compress_cache(void)
> > > >    {
> > > >    	cic_entry_slab = f2fs_kmem_cache_create("f2fs_cic_entry",
> > > >    					sizeof(struct compress_io_ctx));
> > > >    	if (!cic_entry_slab)
> > > >    		return -ENOMEM;
> > > > -	return 0;
> > > > -}
> > > > -
> > > > -static void f2fs_destroy_cic_cache(void)
> > > > -{
> > > > -	kmem_cache_destroy(cic_entry_slab);
> > > > -}
> > > > -
> > > > -static int __init f2fs_init_dic_cache(void)
> > > > -{
> > > >    	dic_entry_slab = f2fs_kmem_cache_create("f2fs_dic_entry",
> > > >    					sizeof(struct decompress_io_ctx));
> > > >    	if (!dic_entry_slab)
> > > > -		return -ENOMEM;
> > > > -	return 0;
> > > > -}
> > > > -
> > > > -static void f2fs_destroy_dic_cache(void)
> > > > -{
> > > > -	kmem_cache_destroy(dic_entry_slab);
> > > > -}
> > > > -
> > > > -int __init f2fs_init_compress_cache(void)
> > > > -{
> > > > -	int err;
> > > > -
> > > > -	err = f2fs_init_cic_cache();
> > > > -	if (err)
> > > > -		goto out;
> > > > -	err = f2fs_init_dic_cache();
> > > > -	if (err)
> > > >    		goto free_cic;
> > > >    	return 0;
> > > >    free_cic:
> > > > -	f2fs_destroy_cic_cache();
> > > > -out:
> > > > +	kmem_cache_destroy(cic_entry_slab);
> > > >    	return -ENOMEM;
> > > >    }
> > > >    void f2fs_destroy_compress_cache(void)
> > > >    {
> > > > -	f2fs_destroy_dic_cache();
> > > > -	f2fs_destroy_cic_cache();
> > > > +	kmem_cache_destroy(dic_entry_slab);
> > > > +	kmem_cache_destroy(cic_entry_slab);
> > > >    }
> > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > > > index 560fa80590e9..35c19248b1e2 100644
> > > > --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > > > @@ -39,10 +39,8 @@ static struct bio_set f2fs_bioset;
> > > >    int __init f2fs_init_bioset(void)
> > > >    {
> > > > -	if (bioset_init(&f2fs_bioset, F2FS_BIO_POOL_SIZE,
> > > > -					0, BIOSET_NEED_BVECS))
> > > > -		return -ENOMEM;
> > > > -	return 0;
> > > > +	return bioset_init(&f2fs_bioset, F2FS_BIO_POOL_SIZE,
> > > > +					0, BIOSET_NEED_BVECS);
> > > >    }
> > > >    void f2fs_destroy_bioset(void)
> > > > @@ -4090,9 +4088,7 @@ int f2fs_init_post_read_wq(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> > > >    	sbi->post_read_wq = alloc_workqueue("f2fs_post_read_wq",
> > > >    						 WQ_UNBOUND | WQ_HIGHPRI,
> > > >    						 num_online_cpus());
> > > > -	if (!sbi->post_read_wq)
> > > > -		return -ENOMEM;
> > > > -	return 0;
> > > > +	return sbi->post_read_wq ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
> > > >    }
> > > >    void f2fs_destroy_post_read_wq(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> > > > @@ -4105,9 +4101,7 @@ int __init f2fs_init_bio_entry_cache(void)
> > > >    {
> > > >    	bio_entry_slab = f2fs_kmem_cache_create("f2fs_bio_entry_slab",
> > > >    			sizeof(struct bio_entry));
> > > > -	if (!bio_entry_slab)
> > > > -		return -ENOMEM;
> > > > -	return 0;
> > > > +	return bio_entry_slab ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
> > > >    }
> > > >    void f2fs_destroy_bio_entry_cache(void)
> > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> > > > index 0f967b1e98f2..4b0d2fa3a769 100644
> > > > --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> > > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> > > > @@ -1903,9 +1903,7 @@ int __init f2fs_create_garbage_collection_cache(void)
> > > >    {
> > > >    	victim_entry_slab = f2fs_kmem_cache_create("f2fs_victim_entry",
> > > >    					sizeof(struct victim_entry));
> > > > -	if (!victim_entry_slab)
> > > > -		return -ENOMEM;
> > > > -	return 0;
> > > > +	return victim_entry_slab ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
> > > >    }
> > > >    void f2fs_destroy_garbage_collection_cache(void)
> > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
> > > > index dea95b48b647..77fd453949b1 100644
> > > > --- a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
> > > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
> > > > @@ -923,9 +923,7 @@ int __init f2fs_create_recovery_cache(void)
> > > >    {
> > > >    	fsync_entry_slab = f2fs_kmem_cache_create("f2fs_fsync_inode_entry",
> > > >    					sizeof(struct fsync_inode_entry));
> > > > -	if (!fsync_entry_slab)
> > > > -		return -ENOMEM;
> > > > -	return 0;
> > > > +	return fsync_entry_slab ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
> > > >    }
> > > >    void f2fs_destroy_recovery_cache(void)
> > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > > > index 31435c8645c8..1d56cba495a5 100644
> > > > --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > > > @@ -288,9 +288,7 @@ static int __init f2fs_create_casefold_cache(void)
> > > >    {
> > > >    	f2fs_cf_name_slab = f2fs_kmem_cache_create("f2fs_casefolded_name",
> > > >    							F2FS_NAME_LEN);
> > > > -	if (!f2fs_cf_name_slab)
> > > > -		return -ENOMEM;
> > > > -	return 0;
> > > > +	return f2fs_cf_name_slab ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
> > > >    }
> > > >    static void f2fs_destroy_casefold_cache(void)
> > > > @@ -4646,9 +4644,7 @@ static int __init init_inodecache(void)
> > > >    	f2fs_inode_cachep = kmem_cache_create("f2fs_inode_cache",
> > > >    			sizeof(struct f2fs_inode_info), 0,
> > > >    			SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT|SLAB_ACCOUNT, NULL);
> > > > -	if (!f2fs_inode_cachep)
> > > > -		return -ENOMEM;
> > > > -	return 0;
> > > > +	return f2fs_inode_cachep ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
> > > >    }
> > > >    static void destroy_inodecache(void)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ