| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20221214235305.31744-7-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 02:52:46 +0300
From: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
To: Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Cai Huoqing <cai.huoqing@...ux.dev>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>, Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
CC: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Pavel Parkhomenko <Pavel.Parkhomenko@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
caihuoqing <caihuoqing@...du.com>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Gustavo Pimentel <Gustavo.Pimentel@...opsys.com>
Subject: [PATCH v7 06/25] dmaengine: dw-edma: Fix invalid interleaved xfers semantics
The interleaved DMA transfer support added in commit 85e7518f42c8
("dmaengine: dw-edma: Add device_prep_interleave_dma() support") seems
contradicting to what the DMA-engine defines. The next conditional
statements:
if (!xfer->xfer.il->numf)
return NULL;
if (xfer->xfer.il->numf > 0 && xfer->xfer.il->frame_size > 0)
return NULL;
basically mean that numf can't be zero and frame_size must always be zero,
otherwise the transfer won't be executed. But further the transfer
execution method takes the frames size from the
dma_interleaved_template.sgl[] array for each frame. That array in
accordance with [1] is supposed to be of
dma_interleaved_template.frame_size size, which as we discovered before
the code expects to be zero. So judging by the dw_edma_device_transfer()
implementation the method implies the dma_interleaved_template.sgl[] array
being of dma_interleaved_template.numf size, which is wrong. Since the
dw_edma_device_transfer() method doesn't permit
dma_interleaved_template.frame_size being non-zero then actual multi-chunk
interleaved transfer turns to be unsupported even though the code implies
having it supported.
Let's fix that by adding a fully functioning support of the interleaved
DMA transfers. First of all dma_interleaved_template.frame_size is
supposed to be greater or equal to one thus having at least simple linear
chunked frames. Secondly we can create a walk-through all over the chunks
and frames just by initializing the number of the eDMA burst transactios
as a multiple of dma_interleaved_template.numf and
dma_interleaved_template.frame_size and getting the frame_size-modulo of
the iteration step as an index of the dma_interleaved_template.sgl[]
array. The rest of the dw_edma_device_transfer() method code can be left
unchanged.
[1] include/linux/dmaengine.h: doc struct dma_interleaved_template
Fixes: 85e7518f42c8 ("dmaengine: dw-edma: Add device_prep_interleave_dma() support")
Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Tested-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
---
drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c | 18 +++++++-----------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
index 35588e14f79a..d5c4192141ef 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
@@ -332,6 +332,7 @@ dw_edma_device_transfer(struct dw_edma_transfer *xfer)
struct dw_edma_chunk *chunk;
struct dw_edma_burst *burst;
struct dw_edma_desc *desc;
+ size_t fsz = 0;
u32 cnt = 0;
int i;
@@ -381,9 +382,7 @@ dw_edma_device_transfer(struct dw_edma_transfer *xfer)
if (xfer->xfer.sg.len < 1)
return NULL;
} else if (xfer->type == EDMA_XFER_INTERLEAVED) {
- if (!xfer->xfer.il->numf)
- return NULL;
- if (xfer->xfer.il->numf > 0 && xfer->xfer.il->frame_size > 0)
+ if (!xfer->xfer.il->numf || xfer->xfer.il->frame_size < 1)
return NULL;
if (!xfer->xfer.il->src_inc || !xfer->xfer.il->dst_inc)
return NULL;
@@ -413,10 +412,8 @@ dw_edma_device_transfer(struct dw_edma_transfer *xfer)
cnt = xfer->xfer.sg.len;
sg = xfer->xfer.sg.sgl;
} else if (xfer->type == EDMA_XFER_INTERLEAVED) {
- if (xfer->xfer.il->numf > 0)
- cnt = xfer->xfer.il->numf;
- else
- cnt = xfer->xfer.il->frame_size;
+ cnt = xfer->xfer.il->numf * xfer->xfer.il->frame_size;
+ fsz = xfer->xfer.il->frame_size;
}
for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++) {
@@ -438,7 +435,7 @@ dw_edma_device_transfer(struct dw_edma_transfer *xfer)
else if (xfer->type == EDMA_XFER_SCATTER_GATHER)
burst->sz = sg_dma_len(sg);
else if (xfer->type == EDMA_XFER_INTERLEAVED)
- burst->sz = xfer->xfer.il->sgl[i].size;
+ burst->sz = xfer->xfer.il->sgl[i % fsz].size;
chunk->ll_region.sz += burst->sz;
desc->alloc_sz += burst->sz;
@@ -481,10 +478,9 @@ dw_edma_device_transfer(struct dw_edma_transfer *xfer)
if (xfer->type == EDMA_XFER_SCATTER_GATHER) {
sg = sg_next(sg);
- } else if (xfer->type == EDMA_XFER_INTERLEAVED &&
- xfer->xfer.il->frame_size > 0) {
+ } else if (xfer->type == EDMA_XFER_INTERLEAVED) {
struct dma_interleaved_template *il = xfer->xfer.il;
- struct data_chunk *dc = &il->sgl[i];
+ struct data_chunk *dc = &il->sgl[i % fsz];
src_addr += burst->sz;
if (il->src_sgl)
--
2.38.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists