[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1671006659-23859-1-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 16:30:59 +0800
From: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
To: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>
Cc: loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] LoongArch: Correct the definition of is_branch_ins()
The current definition of is_branch_ins() is not correct, it was
first introduced in commit 49aef111e2da ("LoongArch: Add prologue
unwinder support"), in fact, there exist three branch instruction
formats rather than only reg1i21_format.
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
---
arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h
index c00e151..42be39be 100644
--- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h
+++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h
@@ -329,8 +329,31 @@ static inline bool is_pc_ins(union loongarch_instruction *ip)
static inline bool is_branch_ins(union loongarch_instruction *ip)
{
- return ip->reg1i21_format.opcode >= beqz_op &&
- ip->reg1i21_format.opcode <= bgeu_op;
+ switch (ip->reg0i26_format.opcode) {
+ case b_op:
+ case bl_op:
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ switch (ip->reg1i21_format.opcode) {
+ case beqz_op:
+ case bnez_op:
+ case bceqz_op:
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ switch (ip->reg2i16_format.opcode) {
+ case jirl_op:
+ case beq_op:
+ case bne_op:
+ case blt_op:
+ case bge_op:
+ case bltu_op:
+ case bgeu_op:
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ return false;
}
static inline bool is_ra_save_ins(union loongarch_instruction *ip)
--
2.1.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists