[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ffd94b2-e72c-a081-4326-5bc254603ddf@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 12:55:21 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@...il.com>,
Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@...il.com>
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] dt-bindings: pinctrl: mt7620: add proper function
muxing binding
On 13/12/2022 14:04, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
> Not every function can be muxed to a group. Add proper binding which
> documents which function can be muxed to a group or set of groups.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
> ---
> .../pinctrl/ralink,mt7620-pinctrl.yaml | 632 +++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 596 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/ralink,mt7620-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/ralink,mt7620-pinctrl.yaml
> index 6f17f3991640..06880c80ba80 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/ralink,mt7620-pinctrl.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/ralink,mt7620-pinctrl.yaml
> @@ -29,47 +29,608 @@ patternProperties:
> $ref: pinmux-node.yaml#
>
> properties:
> - groups:
> - description: The pin group to select.
> - enum: [
> - # common
> - i2c, spi, wdt,
> -
> - # For MT7620 SoC
> - ephy, mdio, nd_sd, pa, pcie, rgmii1, rgmii2, spi refclk,
> - uartf, uartlite, wled,
> -
> - # For MT7628 and MT7688 SoCs
> - gpio, i2s, p0led_an, p0led_kn, p1led_an, p1led_kn, p2led_an,
> - p2led_kn, p3led_an, p3led_kn, p4led_an, p4led_kn, perst, pwm0,
> - pwm1, refclk, sdmode, spi cs1, spis, uart0, uart1, uart2,
> - wled_an, wled_kn,
> - ]
> -
> function:
> - description: The mux function to select.
> - enum: [
> - # common
> - gpio, i2c, refclk, spi,
> -
> - # For MT7620 SoC
> - ephy, gpio i2s, gpio uartf, i2s uartf, mdio, nand, pa,
> - pcie refclk, pcie rst, pcm gpio, pcm i2s, pcm uartf,
> - rgmii1, rgmii2, sd, spi refclk, uartf, uartlite, wdt refclk,
> - wdt rst, wled,
> -
> - # For MT7628 and MT7688 SoCs
> - antenna, debug, i2s, jtag, p0led_an, p0led_kn,
> - p1led_an, p1led_kn, p2led_an, p2led_kn, p3led_an, p3led_kn,
> - p4led_an, p4led_kn, pcie, pcm, perst, pwm, pwm0, pwm1, pwm_uart2,
> - rsvd, sdxc, sdxc d5 d4, sdxc d6, sdxc d7, spi cs1,
> - spis, sw_r, uart0, uart1, uart2, utif, wdt, wled_an, wled_kn, -,
> - ]
> + description:
> + A string containing the name of the function to mux to the group.
> + anyOf:
> + - description: For MT7620 SoC
> + enum: [ephy, gpio, gpio i2s, gpio uartf, i2c, i2s uartf, mdio, nand, pa,
> + pcie refclk, pcie rst, pcm gpio, pcm i2s, pcm uartf, refclk,
> + rgmii1, rgmii2, sd, spi, spi refclk, uartf, uartlite, wdt refclk,
> + wdt rst, wled]
> +
> + - description: For MT7628 and MT7688 SoCs
> + enum: [antenna, debug, gpio, i2c, i2s, jtag, p0led_an, p0led_kn,
> + p1led_an, p1led_kn, p2led_an, p2led_kn, p3led_an, p3led_kn,
> + p4led_an, p4led_kn, pcie, pcm, perst, pwm, pwm0, pwm1, pwm_uart2,
> + refclk, rsvd, sdxc, sdxc d5 d4, sdxc d6, sdxc d7, spi, spi cs1,
> + spis, sw_r, uart0, uart1, uart2, utif, wdt, wled_an, wled_kn, -]
> +
> + groups:
> + description:
> + An array of strings. Each string contains the name of a group.
>
> required:
> - groups
> - function
>
> + allOf:
> + - if:
> + properties:
> + function:
> + const: antenna
> + then:
> + properties:
> + groups:
> + enum: [i2s]
I have doubts such setup is maintainable and readable. I would suggest
to leave just few - maybe for gpio, jtag, refclk, utif.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists