lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221214134656.21228-1-schspa@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 14 Dec 2022 21:46:56 +0800
From:   Schspa Shi <schspa@...il.com>
To:     mcgrof@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Schspa Shi <schspa@...il.com>,
        syzbot+10d19d528d9755d9af22@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
        syzbot+70d5d5d83d03db2c813d@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
        syzbot+83cb0411d0fcf0a30fc1@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
        syzbot+c92c6a251d49ceceb625@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: [PATCH v2] umh: fix out of scope usage when the process is being killed

When the process is killed, wait_for_completion_state will return with
-ERESTARTSYS, and the completion variable in the stack will be unavailable,
even freed. If the user-mode thread is complete at the same time, there
will be a race to use a unavailable variable.

Please refer to the following scenarios.
            T1                                  T2
------------------------------------------------------------------
call_usermodehelper_exec
                                   call_usermodehelper_exec_async
                                   << do something >>
                                   umh_complete(sub_info);
                                   comp = xchg(&sub_info->complete, NULL);
                                   /* we got the completion */
                                   << context switch >>

    << Being killed >>
	retval = wait_for_completion_state(sub_info->complete, state);
	if (!retval)
		goto wait_done;

	if (wait & UMH_KILLABLE) {
		/* umh_complete() will see NULL and free sub_info */
		if (xchg(&sub_info->complete, NULL))
			goto unlock;
        << we can't got the completion, because T2 take it already >>
	}
	....
	return retval;
}

/**
 * the completion variable in stack is end of life cycle.
 * and maybe freed due to process is recycled.
 */
                                   -------- BUG here----------
                                   if (comp)
                                       complete(comp);

To fix it, we can add an additional wait_for_completion to ensure the
completion object is completely unused. And this is what
kthread_create_on_node does to handle this race.

Reported-by: syzbot+10d19d528d9755d9af22@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+70d5d5d83d03db2c813d@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+83cb0411d0fcf0a30fc1@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+c92c6a251d49ceceb625@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@...il.com>
---

v1->v2:
  - Use a new way to fix the race as kthread_create_on_node do.
  - Optimize comments and use more accurate words to describe the problem.

 kernel/umh.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/umh.c b/kernel/umh.c
index 850631518665..d8350a195c7f 100644
--- a/kernel/umh.c
+++ b/kernel/umh.c
@@ -452,6 +452,10 @@ int call_usermodehelper_exec(struct subprocess_info *sub_info, int wait)
 		/* umh_complete() will see NULL and free sub_info */
 		if (xchg(&sub_info->complete, NULL))
 			goto unlock;
+		/*
+		 * umh_complete will call complete() shortly.
+		 */
+		wait_for_completion(&done);
 	}
 
 wait_done:
-- 
2.37.3

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ