[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0jADnJvgvHa7tVEhqYtSvArVYccJpaq=LWm5=pqfkOh8A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 14:53:19 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: rafael@...nel.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, rui.zhang@...el.com,
amitk@...nel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal: intel: Don't set HFI status bit to 1
On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 4:16 AM Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 6:07 PM Srinivas Pandruvada
> <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > When CPU doesn't support HFI (Hardware Feedback Interface), don't include
> > BIT 26 in the mask to prevent clearing. otherwise this results in:
> > unchecked MSR access error: WRMSR to 0x1b1
> > (tried to write 0x0000000004000aa8)
> > at rIP: 0xffffffff8b8559fe (throttle_active_work+0xbe/0x1b0)
> >
> > Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
> > Fixes: 6fe1e64b6026 ("thermal: intel: Prevent accidental clearing of HFI status")
> > Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
>
> You can add my tested-by as well, it seems to fix the issue.
>
> Of course, it could be that I just didn't happen to trigger the
> throttling in my test just now, so that testing is pretty limited, but
> at least from a very quick check it seems good.
I've applied the patch for 6.2-rc1, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists