[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <167104053516.12018.3829902997304947122.b4-ty@kernel.dk>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 10:55:35 -0700
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ken Chen <kenchen@...gle.com>,
"Isaac J. Manjarres" <isaacmanjarres@...gle.com>
Cc: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...roid.com, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v1] loop: Fix the max_loop commandline argument
treatment when it is set to 0
On Thu, 08 Dec 2022 13:29:01 -0800, Isaac J. Manjarres wrote:
> Currently, the max_loop commandline argument can be used to specify how
> many loop block devices are created at init time. If it is not
> specified on the commandline, CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LOOP_MIN_COUNT loop block
> devices will be created.
>
> The max_loop commandline argument can be used to override the value of
> CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LOOP_MIN_COUNT. However, when max_loop is set to 0
> through the commandline, the current logic treats it as if it had not
> been set, and creates CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LOOP_MIN_COUNT devices anyway.
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] loop: Fix the max_loop commandline argument treatment when it is set to 0
commit: 85c50197716c60fe57f411339c579462e563ac57
Best regards,
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists