[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y5oP2Psz++gHholO@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 18:03:04 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched: Make const-safe
On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 10:11:01AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 02:49:46PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote:
> > With a modified container_of() that preserves constness, the compiler
> > finds some pointers which should have been marked as const. task_of()
> > also needs to become const-preserving for the !FAIR_GROUP_SCHED case so
> > that cfs_rq_of() can take a const argument. No change to generated code.
>
> More const more better I suppose.. Thanks!
>
> Happen to have a sha for the container_of() commit handy?
There isn't one yet. Obviously we can't make container_of()
const-preserving until we've fixed all the places which would warn.
The diff I have in my tree looks like this:
diff --git a/include/linux/container_of.h b/include/linux/container_of.h
index 1d898f9158b4..9416e6cc8c88 100644
--- a/include/linux/container_of.h
+++ b/include/linux/container_of.h
@@ -20,7 +20,10 @@
static_assert(__same_type(*(ptr), ((type *)0)->member) || \
__same_type(*(ptr), void), \
"pointer type mismatch in container_of()"); \
- ((type *)(__mptr - offsetof(type, member))); })
+ __mptr -= offsetof(type, member); \
+ _Generic(ptr, \
+ const typeof(*(ptr)) *: (const type *)__mptr, \
+ default: ((type *)__mptr)); })
/**
* container_of_const - cast a member of a structure out to the containing
I have all of fs/ and net/ compiling cleanly now. There are a few
places which really need the const-removing properties, and I've made
those call a new macro called container_of_not_const(), but I don't
like that name.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists