lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <167104323615.416042.13205866259522482706.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 14 Dec 2022 18:40:36 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: fsl_spi: Don't change speed while chipselect is active

On Wed, 14 Dec 2022 14:41:33 +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Commit c9bfcb315104 ("spi_mpc83xx: much improved driver") made
> modifications to the driver to not perform speed changes while
> chipselect is active. But those changes where lost with the
> convertion to tranfer_one.
> 
> Previous implementation was allowing speed changes during
> message transfer when cs_change flag was set.
> At the time being, core SPI does not provide any feature to change
> speed while chipselect is off, so do not allow any speed change during
> message transfer, and perform the transfer setup in prepare_message
> in order to set correct speed while chipselect is still off.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] spi: fsl_spi: Don't change speed while chipselect is active
      commit: 3b553e0041a65e499fa4e25ee146f01f4ec4e617

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ