[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <167104323615.416042.13205866259522482706.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 18:40:36 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: fsl_spi: Don't change speed while chipselect is active
On Wed, 14 Dec 2022 14:41:33 +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Commit c9bfcb315104 ("spi_mpc83xx: much improved driver") made
> modifications to the driver to not perform speed changes while
> chipselect is active. But those changes where lost with the
> convertion to tranfer_one.
>
> Previous implementation was allowing speed changes during
> message transfer when cs_change flag was set.
> At the time being, core SPI does not provide any feature to change
> speed while chipselect is off, so do not allow any speed change during
> message transfer, and perform the transfer setup in prepare_message
> in order to set correct speed while chipselect is still off.
>
> [...]
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] spi: fsl_spi: Don't change speed while chipselect is active
commit: 3b553e0041a65e499fa4e25ee146f01f4ec4e617
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark
Powered by blists - more mailing lists